Killing civilians or holding territory how to think about terrorism

Victor Asal, Luis De La Calle, Michael Findley, Joseph Young

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many scholars of political violence conceptualize terrorism as an act of violence and measure each incident accordingly. Dugan and LaFree, co-creators of the largest open-source, action-based terrorism database (The Global Terrorism Database or GTD), provide an outline of the GTD's additive value to the study of terrorism. De la Calle and Sánchez-Cuenca offer an approach based on the control of territory that insurgents hold offers a clear measurement strategy. Victor Asal uses the De la Calle and Sánchez-Cuenca classification schema for sorting out cases that are less cited by conflict scholars. Findley and Young conclude that there are costs associated with each, action-based approaches can lead to overcounting of terrorist events, but that the actor-based approach leads to significant undercounting of terrorist events and exclusion of highly relevant events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-497
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Killing civilians or holding territory how to think about terrorism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this