Abstract
Statistical methods that quantify the discourse about causal inferences in terms of possible sources of biases are becoming increasingly important to many social-science fields such as public policy, sociology, and education. These methods are also known as “robustness or sensitivity analyses”. A series of recent works (Frank [2000, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 147–194]; Pan and Frank [2003, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 28: 315– 337]; Frank and Min [2007, Sociological Methodology 37: 349–392]; and Frank et al. [2013, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35: 437–460]) on robustness analysis extends earlier methods. We implement these recent developments in Stata. In particular, we provide commands to quantify the percent bias necessary to invalidate an inference from a Rubin causal model framework and the robustness of causal inferences in terms of correlations associated with unobserved variables.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 523-550 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Stata Journal |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 StataCorp LLC.
Keywords
- bias
- causal inferences
- confounding
- konfound
- mkonfound
- pkonfound
- robustness or sensitivity analyses
- st0565
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Statistics and Probability
- Mathematics (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver