Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

KRAS mutations and their prognostic implications in appendiceal cancers.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Despite shared embryonic origin, appendiceal cancers (AC) have distinct clinical and molecular features compared to colorectal cancers (CRC). Detection of mutant KRAS has been associated with worse survival in CRC, whereas in AC the prognostic significance of mutant KRAS (55-65% prevalence) has yet to be characterized. Methods: AC tissues from 852 individual patients that underwent DNA (592, NextSeq, or whole exome sequencing) and whole transcriptome sequencing (NovaSeq) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) were analyzed. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms were excluded. Chi-square, Fishers-exact, and Mann Whitney U tests were used to determine statistical significance and were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing (p< 0.05). Real-world overall survival (OS) was calculated using insurance claims of AC patients from time of sample collection to last contact. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model (log-rank test). Multivariate regression analysis was performed on age, sex, histology, site, comutations and KRASmut vs. KRASwt. Results: AC histological subtypes comprised mucinous adenocarcinoma (37.9%), goblet cell carcinoma (19.6%), signet ring cell carcinoma (12.1%), and adenocarcinoma- not otherwise specified (NOS, 30.4%). Among all AC specimens, KRAS was the most common mutation (49%). KRAS mut vs. KRAS wt tumors were more frequently associated with TP53 mut (51.2% vs. 36.8%, respectively; p< 0.01) and GNAS mut (41.1% vs. 5.7%, respectively; p < 0.00001). Most frequent co-mutant gene with KRAS was TP53 (61.2%) in adenocarcinoma-NOS, and GNAS (46.9%) in mucinous adenocarcinomas.Median OS among KRASmut vs. KRASwt was 33.3 vs. 25.1 months, respectively (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.80, p < 0.00001). KRASmut was associated with improved survival in mucinous adenocarcinomas (HR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52-0.96, p = 0.028) and adenocarcinoma-NOS (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97, p = 0.025), but not with signet ring cell (HR 1.92; 95% CI: 0.90-4.10, p = 0.087) or goblet cell carcinoma (HR 1.39; 95% CI: 0.50-3.91, p = 0.536). Multivariate analysis showed KRASmut was an independent prognostic factor for improved survival among all AC (HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93, p = 0.007) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.84, p<0.0001).Notably, GNASmut was associated with improved survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.70, p < 0.00001), while TP53mut was associated with poorer survival (HR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.35-1.86, p < 0.00001) among all AC. Conclusions: KRAS was one of most frequently mutated genes in ACs. In contrast to CRC, KRASmut was associated with significantly improved survival. This observed survival advantage remained consistent in the histologic subgroup of mucinous adenocarcinoma, but not in goblet and signet ring cell cancers. Further studies with population level data understanding the molecular profiles and their survival implications in histologically distinct AC are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4177
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume42
Issue number16_suppl
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'KRAS mutations and their prognostic implications in appendiceal cancers.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this