Land Use Regression models for 60 volatile organic compounds: Comparing Google Point of Interest (POI) and city permit data

  • Tianjun Lu
  • , Jennifer Lansing
  • , Wenwen Zhang
  • , Matthew J. Bechle
  • , Steve Hankey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Land Use Regression (LUR) models of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) normally focus on land use (e.g., industrial area) or transportation facilities (e.g., roadway); here, we incorporate area sources (e.g., gas stations) from city permitting data and Google Point of Interest (POI) data to compare model performance. We used measurements from 50 community-based sampling locations (2013–2015) in Minneapolis, MN, USA to develop LUR models for 60 VOCs. We used three sets of independent variables: (1) base-case models with land use and transportation variables, (2) models that add area source variables from local business permit data, and (3) models that use Google POI data for area sources. The models with Google POI data performed best; for example, the total VOC (TVOC) model has better goodness-of-fit (adj-R 2 : 0.56; Root Mean Square Error [RMSE]: 0.32 μg/m 3 ) as compared to the permit data model (0.42; 0.37) and the base-case model (0.26; 0.41). Area source variables were selected in over two thirds of models among the 60 VOCs at small-scale buffer sizes (e.g., 25 m–500 m). Our work suggests that VOC LUR models can be developed using community-based sampling and that models improve by including area sources as measured by business permit and Google POI data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-141
Number of pages11
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume677
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 10 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors

Funding

This publication was developed as part of the Center for Air, Climate, and Energy Solutions (CACES), which was supported under Assistance Agreement No. R835873 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. The authors acknowledge Patrick Hanlon for providing the VOC sampling data and funding from Minneapolis Health Department. This publication was developed as part of the Center for Air, Climate, and Energy Solutions (CACES), which was supported under Assistance Agreement No. R835873 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. The authors acknowledge Patrick Hanlon for providing the VOC sampling data and funding from Minneapolis Health Department.

FundersFunder number
Center for Indoor Air Research
Minneapolis Health Department
U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyR835873
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Keywords

    • Exposure assessment
    • Hazardous air pollutants
    • Local emissions
    • Volunteer-based monitoring

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Engineering
    • Environmental Chemistry
    • Waste Management and Disposal
    • Pollution

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Land Use Regression models for 60 volatile organic compounds: Comparing Google Point of Interest (POI) and city permit data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this