LATE-NC Stage 3: a diagnostic rubric to differentiate severe LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP

Ryan K. Shahidehpour, Yuriko Katsumata, Dennis W. Dickson, Nikhil B. Ghayal, Khine Zin Aung, Xian Wu, Panhavuth Phe, Gregory A. Jicha, Allison M. Neltner, Jessalin R.C. Archer, Maria M. Corrada, Claudia H. Kawas, S. Ahmad Sajjadi, Davis C. Woodworth, Syed A. Bukhari, Thomas J. Montine, David W. Fardo, Peter T. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A diagnostic rubric is required to distinguish between limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP). In LATE-NC Stage 3, TDP-43 proteinopathy is present in the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), thus posing a potential diagnostic challenge in differentiating these severe LATE-NC cases from FTLD-TDP. LATE-NC Stage 3 cases and other TDP-43 proteinopathies were analyzed from the University of Kentucky (total n = 514 with TDP-43 pathology assessed), The 90+ Study at the University of California Irvine (n = 458), and the Mayo Clinic (n = 5067) brain banks. Digital pathology was used to quantify pathology burden in a select subset of cases (n = 51), complemented by a previously-described manual counting method and expert neuropathologic examinations to evaluate qualitative features such as FTLD-TDP types and subtypes of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). To evaluate clinical and genetic characteristics of LATE-NC Stage 3, data were analyzed from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) Neuropathology Data set and correlated with findings from the Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC). When using TDP-43 proteinopathy quantification in the MFG as a diagnostic criterion, more than 90% of cases could be classified as either LATE-NC Stage 3 or FTLD-TDP. Diagnostically challenging scenarios included a subset of FTLD-TDP Type B cases with relatively mild MFG TDP-43 pathology and a novel non-LATE-NC, non-FTLD-TDP pathologic subtype with severe MFG TDP-43 pathology. Taking these potential pitfalls into account, a classification schema was developed that could correctly diagnose all included cases. There was no difference in the Alzheimer’s disease pathological load in LATE-NC Stages 2 versus 3. In genetic analyses, the GRN (rs5848) risk allele was preferentially associated with LATE-NC Stage 3, whereas TMEM106B and APOE risk-associated variants were not. In conclusion, LATE-NC Stage 3 could be differentiated reliably from FTLD-TDP and other TDP-43-opathies, based on a data-driven diagnostic rubric.

Original languageEnglish
Article number38
JournalActa Neuropathologica
Volume149
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • ALS
  • ARTAG
  • FTLD-MND
  • LNT
  • ScanScope
  • rs1990622

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'LATE-NC Stage 3: a diagnostic rubric to differentiate severe LATE-NC from FTLD-TDP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this