Lessons from the French Funding Debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The French retirement system, like the American social security system, is facing long-term funding difficulties. As a result, the French are debating whether to expand the role of pre-funded retirement plans. The economic arguments presented in this debate are virtually identical to the economic arguments presented in the American debate on whether the American social security system should be partially privatized.

The French and American debates, however, diverge once history and ideology are considered. The French have a history of failed funded pensions in contrast to the United States where the failure of prominent underfunded pension led to the enactment of ERISA. And while individual choice and individual responsibility are quintessential American values, "solidarity" plays a much bigger role in the French debate.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)5-26
JournalOhio State Law Journal
Volume65
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons from the French Funding Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this