Abstract
Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) are a popular conservation instrument in the Global South. However, little is known about how evolving PES design features affect local institutions and collective participation dynamics. Drawing on long-term field research spanning over a decade, we address this gap by investigating the evolution of PES design features and local responses by community participants in 10 communities of Selva Lacandona, state of Chiapas, Mexico. We show that Mexican PES programmes have shifted their goals over time, progressively adding productive, organisational, and social inclusion concerns to their main goal of forest conservation. We document a set of local responses to such PES design changes, namely: i) efforts to secure sustained programme access; ii) adaptations to local benefit-sharing and participation agreements; and iii) discontinuities in enrolment triggered by specific changes in design features. We also show that participants’ interests and practices align with PES forest protection goals but reflect a partial involvement of the community (or constrained collective action) in conservation affairs. Overall, our findings illustrate the dynamic interplay and resulting (mis)alignments between PES goals, outcomes, and participants’ practices and interests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101305 |
| Journal | Ecosystem Services |
| Volume | 50 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Funding
However, satisfying productive and organisational commitments was challenging and expensive. The intermediary and ejidatarios did not develop forestry plans or certifications because these activities were considered unfeasible and undesirable (see Section 3.3 ). However, to secure extra application points, applicants in every ejido and the PES intermediary developed community-based instruments for territorial planning (except for Galacia where the president refused to participate). The development of these instruments was funded by the intermediary and involved training and support from external consultants. Similarly, the ejidos and the intermediary developed other activities over time to secure extra application points, such as participatory community planning assessments (P-Predial). These joint efforts to satisfy changing design features were highly successful: 73% (54 of 74) of PES applications in MdC received funding (see Table 2 ), which is much higher than the ~10% success rate for PSA applications in Chiapas in 2016 (CONAFOR staff interviewed in 2016) and the 31% success rate for PESL in 2013. We thank Roldan Muradian, Pamela McElwee, and three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on earlier versions of this document. Thank you to the staff at Estaci?n Chajul for their support and the people in Marqu?s de Comillas and CONAFOR for sharing their time and knowledge.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Canada Research Chair in Ecological Economics | PID2019-109758GB-I00 |
| Pamela McElwee | |
| Roldan Muradian | |
| Comisión Nacional Forestal | |
| Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica | CEX2019-000940-M |
| Mitacs | IT10488 |
| Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades |
Keywords
- Adaptive governance
- Collective action
- Payments for environmental services
- PES
- Policy design
- Selva Lacandona
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Global and Planetary Change
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Ecology
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law