Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience

Justin C. Strickland, William W. Stoops, Matthew L. Banks, Cassandra D. Gipson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are heterogeneous and complex, making the development of translationally predictive rodent and nonhuman primate models to uncover their neurobehavioral underpinnings difficult. Neuroscience-focused outcomes have become highly prevalent, and with this, the notion that SUDs are disorders of the brain embraced as a dominant theoretical orientation to understand SUD etiology and treatment. These efforts, however, have led to few efficacious pharmacotherapies, and in some cases (as with cocaine or methamphetamine), no pharmacotherapies have translated from preclinical models for clinical use. In this theoretical commentary, we first describe the development of animal models of substance use behaviors from a historical perspective. We then define and discuss three logical fallacies including 1) circular explanation, 2) affirming the consequent, and 3) reification that can apply to developed models. We then provide three case examples in which conceptual or logical issues exist in common methods (i.e., behavioral economic demand, escalation, and reinstatement). Alternative strategies to refocus behavioral models are suggested for the field to better bridge the translational divide between animal models, the clinical condition of SUDs, and current and future regulatory pathways for intervention development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-403
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Volume117
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Joshua S. Beckmann (University of Kentucky), Drs. David H. Epstein and Yavin Shaham (National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Program), and Dr. Derek D. Reed (University of Kansas) for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health grants DA054098 (to JCS), DA053820 (to MLB), DA046526, DA044479, DA045881 (to CDG), and DA049130 (to CDG and WWS). Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Joshua S. Beckmann (University of Kentucky), Drs. David H. Epstein and Yavin Shaham (National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Program), and Dr. Derek D. Reed (University of Kansas) for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health grants DA054098 (to JCS), DA053820 (to MLB), DA046526, DA044479, DA045881 (to CDG), and DA049130 (to CDG and WWS). Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords

  • addiction
  • animal
  • model
  • translation
  • treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this