Making Stuff Up

Richard H. Underwood

Making Stuff Up

Rosenberg College of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Beginning with an article in this Journal almost thirty years ago, Professor Underwood continues to research and write about legal ethics and litigation. In this Commentary, he offers a witty look at several cases where, in his opinion, the judge allowed improper arguments to the jury.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	151-163
Journal	The American Journal of Trial Advocacy
Volume	34
Issue number	1
State	Published - Jul 1 2010

Access to Document

https://uknowledge.uky.edu/context/law_facpub/article/1262/viewcontent

Cite this

@article{cd65fdabbb414753b95d87454f2d5b65,

title = "Making Stuff Up",

abstract = "Beginning with an article in this Journal almost thirty years ago, Professor Underwood continues to research and write about legal ethics and litigation. In this Commentary, he offers a witty look at several cases where, in his opinion, the judge allowed improper arguments to the jury. ",

author = "Underwood, {Richard H.}",

year = "2010",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "34",

pages = "151--163",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Stuff Up

AU - Underwood, Richard H.

PY - 2010/7/1

Y1 - 2010/7/1

N2 - Beginning with an article in this Journal almost thirty years ago, Professor Underwood continues to research and write about legal ethics and litigation. In this Commentary, he offers a witty look at several cases where, in his opinion, the judge allowed improper arguments to the jury.

AB - Beginning with an article in this Journal almost thirty years ago, Professor Underwood continues to research and write about legal ethics and litigation. In this Commentary, he offers a witty look at several cases where, in his opinion, the judge allowed improper arguments to the jury.

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 151

EP - 163

IS - 1

ER -

Making Stuff Up

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this