Abstract
As soybean (Glycine max) production continues to expand in the United States and Canada, so do pathogens and pests that directly threaten soybean yield potential and economic returns for farmers. One such pathogen is the soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines). SCN has traditionally been managed using SCN-resistant cultivars and rotation with nonhost crops, but the interaction of SCN with sudden death syndrome (SDS; caused by Fusarium virguliforme) in the field makes management more difficult. Nematode-protectant seed treatments have become options for SCN and SDS management. The objectives of this study were to evaluate nematode-protectant seed treatments for their effects on (i) early and full season SCN reproduction, (ii) foliar symptoms and root-rot caused by SDS, and (iii) soybean yield across environments accounting for the above factors. Using a standard protocol, field trials were implemented in 13 states and one Canadian province from 2019 to 2021 constituting 51 site-years. Six nematode-protectant seed treatment products were compared with a fungicide + insecticide base treatment and a nontreated check. Initial (at soybean planting) and final (at soybean harvest) SCN egg populations were enumerated, and SCN females were extracted from roots and counted at 30 to 35 days postplanting. Foliar disease index (FDX) and root rot caused by the SDS pathogen were evaluated, and yield data were collected for each plot. No seed treatment offered significant nematode control versus the nontreated check for in-season and full-season nematode response, no matter the initial SCN population or FDX level. Of all treatments, ILEVO (fluopyram) and Saltro (pydiflumetofen) provided more consistent increases in yield over the nontreated check in a broader range of SCN environments, even when FDX level was high.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1729-1739 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Plant Disease |
Volume | 108 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The American Phytopathological Society.
Funding
This work was generously supported by the Soybean Checkoff through the North Central Soybean Research Program project, the Kentucky Soybean Promotion Board, the Michigan Soybean Committee, and the Missouri Soybean Merchandizing Council project number 19-438. Additional funding was provided by BASF to support this project. A special thanks to T. Bauer and J. Mullock for assistance in coordinating and providing uniform treatment of seed each year. The authors wish to thank numerous field staff and summer help for countless hours contributed to data collection for this project. They especially wish to thank: A.M. Byrne, J.F. Boyse, S.B. Brand, J.L., Jacobs, A. Gott, J. Halvorson, K. Mehl, B. Mueller, C. van Herk, L. Newton, J. Ravellette, J. Walsh, N. White, and S. Wiggs. Funding: This work was generously supported by the Soybean Checkoff through the North Central Soybean Research Program project, the Kentucky Soybean Promotion Board, the Michigan Soybean Committee, and the Missouri Soybean Merchandizing Council project number 19-438. Additional funding was provided by BASF to support this project.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Kentucky Soybean Promotion Board | |
BASF | |
Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council | 19-438 |
Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council |
Keywords
- seed treatments
- soybean
- soybean cyst nematode
- sudden death syndrome
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Plant Science