Abstract
Manipulation and bribery have received much attention from the social choice community. We study these concepts for preference formalisms that identify a set of optimal outcomes rather than a single winning outcome. We assume that preferences may be ranked (differ in importance), and we use the Pareto principle adjusted to the case of ranked preferences as the preference aggregation rule. For two important classes of preferences, representing the extreme ends of the spectrum, we provide characterizations of situations when manipulation and bribery is possible, and establish the complexity of the problems to decide that.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Algorithmic Decision Theory - 4th International Conference, ADT 2015, Proceedings |
Editors | Toby Walsh |
Pages | 86-102 |
Number of pages | 17 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2015 |
Event | 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015 - Lexington, United States Duration: Sep 27 2015 → Sep 30 2015 |
Publication series
Name | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) |
---|---|
Volume | 9346 |
ISSN (Print) | 0302-9743 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 1611-3349 |
Conference
Conference | 4th International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2015 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Lexington |
Period | 9/27/15 → 9/30/15 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Computer Science