Abstract
This paper examines medical managers' beliefs about the impact reduced-hour career paths for physicians has on organizational effectiveness. The findings of this exploratory inductive study of 17 medical managers at nine medical organizations in the Boston area suggest that managers believe the benefits of reduced-hour physicians (RHPs) far outweigh the disadvantages. However, many of their reasons appear to be exploitative of RHPs. In particular, managers believe that employing RHPs results in increased managerial control and that RHPs should: work more than they are compensated for; do a disproportionate share of the undesirable work; and remain extra flexible and available to the organization. An interpretation of the findings based on psychological contract theory is offered, and may help to illuminate other results reported in the literature, including some controversial findings that reduced-hour workers tend to have poor health outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 262-278 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Organization and Management |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Clinical medicine
- Hospital management
- Part time workers
- Psychological contracts
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Medical managers' beliefs about reduced-hour physicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver