Abstract
Purpose This study quantified the metabolic demands (oxygen uptake (VO2)), power output adjustments, changes in the VO2/power output ratio, and perceptual responses (rating of perceived exertion (RPE)) during constant heart rate (HR) exercise performed within the vigorous intensity range (77%-95% HRpeak). Methods Twelve women (mean ± SD age, 22 ± 4 yr) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters, and three randomly ordered, constant HR trials to exhaustion or for 60 min at the lower (HRL = 77% HRpeak), middle (HRM = 86% HRpeak), and higher (HRH = 95% HRpeak) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes and patterns of responses were examined for VO2, power output, VO2/power output, and RPE for the composite and for each subject. Results Across the HRL (time to exhaustion (Tlim) = 56.3 ± 9.9 min), HRM (51.8 ± 13.5 min), and HRH (27.2 ± 17.7 min) trials, VO2 and power output decreased quadratically (P < 0.05) relative to the initial value from 10% to 100% of Tlim, whereas the VO2/power output increased quadratically from 20% to 100% Tlim, and RPE increased linearly from 50% to 100% Tlim. The VO2 and RPE, collapsed across time, for HRL (54.3% ± 3.3% VO2peak, 11 ± 1.5 RPE) were lower than HRM (64.9% ± 4.5% VO2peak, 14 ± 1.7 RPE), and both were lower than HRH (80.1% ± 4.1% VO2peak, 17 ± 1.4 RPE). None of the 12 subjects at HRL, 6 at HRM, and 7 at HRH were within the vigorous VO2 range. Conclusions The HRL was not sufficient to meet the desired metabolic intensity for vigorous exercise, whereas the middle to higher end of the range elicited a VO2 within the prescribed range of only ∼50%-60% of the subjects. This study indicated that exercise held constant at a percentage of HRpeak cannot consistently be used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 917-926 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Funding
This study was supported by the University Kinesiology and Health Promotion Spring Research award. The results of the study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
University Kinesiology and Health Promotion Spring Research |
Keywords
- CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS
- CYCLING
- ENDURANCE TRAINING
- METABOLIC INTENSITY
- PERCEPTION OF EFFORT
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation