Methamphetamine Use and Adverse Consequences in the Rural Southern United States: An Ethnographic Overview

Rocky L. Sexton, Robert G. Carlson, Carl G. Leukefeld, Brenda M. Booth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Research on methamphetamine use and related issues often uses data from in-treatment and post-treatment populations in urban areas. Rural ethnographic studies are less common. particularly selfassessments by active methamphetamine users that explore use patterns and their adverse consequences. Such work is especially rare in the rural South. where illicit methamphetamine manufacture and use have recently been increasing. This article presents an ethnographic overview of methamphetamine use in rural Kentucky and Arkansas based on qualitative interviews conducted with 34 active, not-intreatment, primary methamphetamine users. Methamphetamine supply, distribution. and prevalence of methamphetamine use are described. Pathways and motivations for methamphetamine use and use patterns are outlined as well. A discussion of the adverse consequences and potential risks of methamphetamine use follows. The findings indicate that informed drug treatment outreach and reduction of potential adverse consequences among methamphetamine users in rural areas are important issues for public health and for interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-404
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychoactive Drugs
StatePublished - Nov 2006


  • Adverse consequences
  • Ethnography
  • Harm reduction
  • Methamphetamine
  • Rural southern United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Methamphetamine Use and Adverse Consequences in the Rural Southern United States: An Ethnographic Overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this