Abstract
Background: Methamphetamine use is common among persons with opioid use disorder. This study evaluated associations between methamphetamine use and treatment with agonist medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD, specifically buprenorphine, and/or methadone) in U.S. rural communities. Methods: The Rural Opioid Initiative (ROI) is a consortium spanning 10 states and 65 rural counties that included persons who reported past 30-day use of opioids and/or injection drug use between 1/2018 and 3/2020. Analyses were restricted to participants who had ever used opioids and had data on past 30-day methamphetamine use. Multivariable models examined the relationship between methamphetamine use and utilization of agonist MOUD. Results: Among 2899 participants, 2179 (75.2%) also reported recent methamphetamine use. Persons with methamphetamine use compared to those without were younger, more likely to have injected drugs, be unhoused, criminal justice involved, and less likely to have health insurance. Adjusted for age, sex, race, and study site, recent methamphetamine use was associated with lower relative odds of past 30-day methadone treatment (aOR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.45–0.99) and fewer methadone treatment days (aIRR=0.76; 0.57–0.99), but not past 30-day buprenorphine receipt (aOR=0.90; 0.67–1.20), buprenorphine treatment days in past 6 months: aIRR=0.88; 0.69–1.12) or perceived inability to access buprenorphine (aOR=1.12; 0.87–1.44) or methadone (aOR=1.06; 0.76–1.48). Conclusion: Methamphetamine use is common among persons who use opioids in rural U.S. areas and negatively associated with current treatment and retention on methadone but not buprenorphine. Future studies should examine reasons for this disparity and reduce barriers to methadone for persons who use opioids and methamphetamine.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 110911 |
| Journal | Drug and Alcohol Dependence |
| Volume | 250 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023
Funding
This publication is based upon data collected and/or methods developed as part of the Rural Opioid Initiative (ROI), a multi-site study with a common protocol which was developed collaboratively by investigators at eight research institutions and at the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Research presented in this publication is the result of secondary data harmonization and analysis and supported by grant U24DA048538 from NIDA . Primary data collection was supported by grants UG3DA044829/UH3DA044829 , UG3DA044798/UH3DA044798 , UG3DA044830/UH3DA044830 , UG3DA044823/UH3DA044823 , UG3DA044822/UH3DA044822 , UG3DA044831/UH3DA044831 , UG3DA044825 , UG3DA044826/UH3DA044826 , and U24DA044801 co-funded by NIDA , ARC , CDC , and SAMHSA . The authors thank the other ROI investigators and their teams, the ROI Executive Steering Committee chair, Dr. Holly Hagan, the NIDA Science Officer, Dr. Richard Jenkins, and particularly, the participants of the individual ROI studies for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating ROI investigators and institutions can be found on the ROI website at http://ruralopioidinitiative.org/studies.html . This publication is based upon data collected and/or methods developed as part of the Rural Opioid Initiative (ROI), a multi-site study with a common protocol which was developed collaboratively by investigators at eight research institutions and at the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Research presented in this publication is the result of secondary data harmonization and analysis and supported by grant U24DA048538 from NIDA. Primary data collection was supported by grants UG3DA044829/UH3DA044829, UG3DA044798/UH3DA044798, UG3DA044830/UH3DA044830, UG3DA044823/UH3DA044823, UG3DA044822/UH3DA044822, UG3DA044831/UH3DA044831, UG3DA044825, UG3DA044826/UH3DA044826, and U24DA044801 co-funded by NIDA, ARC, CDC, and SAMHSA. The authors thank the other ROI investigators and their teams, the ROI Executive Steering Committee chair, Dr. Holly Hagan, the NIDA Science Officer, Dr. Richard Jenkins, and particularly, the participants of the individual ROI studies for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating ROI investigators and institutions can be found on the ROI website at http://ruralopioidinitiative.org/studies.html.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Rural Opioid Initiative | |
| National Institute on Drug Abuse | |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | |
| Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration | UG3DA044829/UH3DA044829, UG3DA044798/UH3DA044798, UG3DA044826/UH3DA044826, UG3DA044823/UH3DA044823, U24DA048538, UG3DA044831/UH3DA044831, UG3DA044822/UH3DA044822, UG3DA044830/UH3DA044830, UG3DA044825, U24DA044801 |
| Appalachian Regional Commission | |
| Automotive Research and Testing Center |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Amphetamine use
- Methamphetamine use
- Opioid use disorder
- Substance use treatment
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Toxicology
- Pharmacology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Pharmacology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methamphetamine use and utilization of medications for opioid use disorder among rural people who use drugs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver