Abstract
The most common type of bridge on South Dakota local roads is a precast prestressed double-Tee (DT) girder bridge. For old and/or deteriorated bridges, the estimation of the bridge safe live load is necessary to ensure the safety of the traveling public and to prevent excessive bridge damage and collapse. Nevertheless, load rating of damaged bridges is challenging mainly because of a lack of information regarding the capacity and distribution of the live load between damaged components. The main goal of the present work is to propose a systematic analytical load rating methodology for precast bridges, specifically those with DT girders when girders are damaged with different damage levels. First, quantitative definitions in-line with those from AASHTO were modified and proposed to identify all damage types and condition states specific to DT girders. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was performed on the South Dakota DT bridge inventory to comment on the most frequent observed damages. Then, two DT bridges, which had a significant girder-To-girder joint damage, were field tested, and the measured data was used to recommend girder distribution factors and dynamic load allowance specific to DT bridges with deteriorated longitudinal joints. Furthermore, two 45-year-old DT girders, each with significant damage, were used in a strength test, and the measured data from these tests and others collected from the literature was used to validate the capacity estimation method for old and/or damaged DT girders. The verified methods were then utilized to calculate the shear and moment capacities of 23 different DT sections, which have been used in South Dakota. Based on the statistical, experimental, and analytical studies, a new methodology was proposed for load rating of typical damaged DT bridges.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 04020110 |
| Journal | Journal of Bridge Engineering |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Funding
The contents of this document, which was jointly funded by the South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) and the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Mountain Plains Consortium (MPC)—University Transportation Center (UTC), reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SDDOT, the State Transportation Commission, or the Federal Highway Administration. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The authors are thankful to Brian Anderson and Brian Jenner of Forterra Pipe & Precast, LLC., for providing shop drawings of double-tee bridges, Don Hammond of Brosz Engineering, Inc. and Steve Myer of Clark Engineering for sharing inspection reports, Corr Construction Services, Inc. for providing the girder test specimens, and GeoTek Engineering & Testing Services, Inc. for technical services. The assistance and valuable feedback are greatly appreciated from Bob Longbons of the Research Office at the SDDOT, and Zachary Gutzmer of South Dakota State University.
| Funders |
|---|
| U.S. Department of Transportation |
| South Dakota Department of Transportation |
| University Transportation Centers |
| University Transportation Center, Missouri University of Science and Technology |
Keywords
- Damage condition states
- Deteriorated components
- Double-Tee girders
- Field testing
- Load rating
- Strength testing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Building and Construction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodology for Load Rating of Damaged Double-Tee Girder Bridges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver