Mixed findings in directly replicated experimental studies on fake news

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Fake news mimics the look of legitimate news articles even if it does not mimic the standards of journalistic reporting. An increase in fake news has developed along with heightened concern about the veracity of news information, which has been highly politicized as fake news. These problems suggest whether standards of journalistic reporting can overcome the mimicry of real news, and whether the public can correctly identify real news. Here we ask two research questions. Does source information about the news article or its presentation influence the perception that a news article is fake news? What factors influence the perception of fake news? We conducted directly replicated experimental studies that presented four news articles to four subject pools. We show that source information and presentation have limited influence on participants’ judgments of a real news article as fake. Among those who evaluated the articles as fake news, our results show that the less participants thought the article presented a fair, balanced, evidence-based view, the more likely they were to judge it as fake news. These findings warrant discussion about the purpose of news organizations and news reporting as well as about how evidence and fairness work in news information.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFirst Monday
Issue number12
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© This paper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed findings in directly replicated experimental studies on fake news'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this