Abstract
Monazite–xenotime thermometry is a potentially powerful technique for understanding the evolution of Earth systems. While a rich set of experimental and empirical datasets are available for monazite–xen-otime equilibria, five different thermometric calibrations yield significantly different results, making this technique difficult to apply in practice. To clarify best practices for monazite–xenotime thermometry, a com-pilation of published compositional data for monazite and xenotime with independently determined pres-sure–temperature conditions is evaluated. For each existing thermometer, we examine how closely estimated temperatures match independent empirical temperatures and consider how best to calculate monazite end-mem-bers for each thermometer. Monazite–xenotime thermometry is applied to samples from the Northern Highlands Terrane of northern Scotland, which experienced amphibolite–upper greenschist facies metamorphism and penetrative deformation during the Scandian orogeny. Thermometry data in conjunction with U–Pb dating define relatively slow regional cooling across the Scandian thrust nappes. Thermometry data closely match quartz c-axis fabric-based deformation thermometry across the structurally lower nappes, suggesting that monazite and xenotime record the timing and temperature of penetrative deformation and shearing. The data suggest that ductile deformation in the hinterland nappes of the Scandian orogen in Scotland occurred as late as 415–410 Ma.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Geological Society Special Publication |
| Pages | 185-208 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Edition | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Publication series
| Name | Geological Society Special Publication |
|---|---|
| Number | 1 |
| Volume | 537 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0305-8719 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s).
Funding
Funding The LA-ICPMS analyses at University of California Santa Barbara were funded by National Science Foundation grant EAR 1220138 to RDL. The EPMA and SEM analyses were funded by grants to CAM from the Geological Society of America, Sigma Xi and the Department of Geosciences at Virginia Tech.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Department of Geosciences at Virginia Tech | |
| National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | EAR 1220138 |
| Geological Society of America | |
| Sigma Xia |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Water Science and Technology
- Ocean Engineering
- Geology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Monazite–xenotime thermometry: a review of best practices and an example from the Caledonides of northern Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver