TY - JOUR
T1 - Multistate evaluation of plant growth and water use in plastic and alternative nursery containers
AU - Wang, Xueni
AU - Thomas Fernandez, R.
AU - Cregg, Bert M.
AU - Auras, Rafael
AU - Fulcher, Amy
AU - Cochran, Diana R.
AU - Niu, Genhua
AU - Sun, Youping
AU - Bi, Guihong
AU - Nambuthir, Susmitha
AU - Geneve, Robert L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, HortTechnology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Containers made from natural fiber and recycled plastic are marketed as sustainable substitutes for traditional plastic containers in the nursery industry. However, growers’ acceptance of alternative containers is limited by the lack of information on how alternative containers impact plant growth and water use (WU). Weconducted experiments in Michigan,Kentucky, Tennessee,Mississippi, and Texas to test plant growth and WU in five different alternative containers under nursery condition. In 2011, ‘Roemertwo’ wintercreeper (Euonymus fortunei) wereplantedin three types of #1 (≈1 gal) containers 1) black plastic (plastic), 2) wood pulp (WP), and 3) recycled paper (KF). In 2012, ‘Green Velvet’ boxwood (Buxus sempervirens · B. microphylla siebold var. koreana) was evaluated in 1) plastic, 2)WP, 3) fabric (FB), and 4) keratin (KT). In 2013, ‘Dark Knight’ bluebeard (Caryopteris ·clandonensis) was evaluated in 1) plastic, 2) WP, and 3) coir fiber (Coir). Plants grownin alternative containers generally had similar plant growth as plastic containers. ‘Roemertwo’ wintercreeper had high mortality while overwintering in alternative containers with no irrigation. Results from different states generally show plants grown in fiber containers such asWP, FB, and Coir usedmorewater than those in plastic containers. Water use efficiency of plants grown in alternative containers vs. plastic containers depended on plant variety, container type, and climate.
AB - Containers made from natural fiber and recycled plastic are marketed as sustainable substitutes for traditional plastic containers in the nursery industry. However, growers’ acceptance of alternative containers is limited by the lack of information on how alternative containers impact plant growth and water use (WU). Weconducted experiments in Michigan,Kentucky, Tennessee,Mississippi, and Texas to test plant growth and WU in five different alternative containers under nursery condition. In 2011, ‘Roemertwo’ wintercreeper (Euonymus fortunei) wereplantedin three types of #1 (≈1 gal) containers 1) black plastic (plastic), 2) wood pulp (WP), and 3) recycled paper (KF). In 2012, ‘Green Velvet’ boxwood (Buxus sempervirens · B. microphylla siebold var. koreana) was evaluated in 1) plastic, 2)WP, 3) fabric (FB), and 4) keratin (KT). In 2013, ‘Dark Knight’ bluebeard (Caryopteris ·clandonensis) was evaluated in 1) plastic, 2) WP, and 3) coir fiber (Coir). Plants grownin alternative containers generally had similar plant growth as plastic containers. ‘Roemertwo’ wintercreeper had high mortality while overwintering in alternative containers with no irrigation. Results from different states generally show plants grown in fiber containers such asWP, FB, and Coir usedmorewater than those in plastic containers. Water use efficiency of plants grown in alternative containers vs. plastic containers depended on plant variety, container type, and climate.
KW - Biocontainer
KW - Coir container
KW - Daily water use
KW - Fabric container
KW - Keratin
KW - Wood pulp
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924765542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924765542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21273/horttech.25.1.42
DO - 10.21273/horttech.25.1.42
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924765542
SN - 1063-0198
VL - 25
SP - 42
EP - 49
JO - HortTechnology
JF - HortTechnology
IS - 1
ER -