Abstract
Background: Cardiac adverse events (CAEs) are relatively infrequent, but highly lethal, after noncardiac operations. The value of available risk scoring systems is uncertain and these systems can be outdated. We used the Patient Safety in Surgery Study database to develop and test a model to predict patient risk for CAEs after general and vascular surgical operations. Study Design: As part of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, following the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's protocol, multiple demographic, preoperative, perioperative, and outcomes variables were measured during a 3-year period. Data from 128 Veterans Affairs medical center hospitals and from 14 academic medical centers on 183,069 patients were used in a logistic regression analysis to model multivariable predictors of serious CAEs (cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of operation). Results: CAEs occurred in 2,362 patients (1.29%) and of these, 59.44% expired. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression identified 20 independent predictors of CAEs, which excluded most cardiac-specific risk factors. The most important multivariable predictors of CAE were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, work relative value units of the most complex procedure, age, and type of operation. A risk prediction scoring system using the logistic regression odds ratios proved to be a useful prediction tool when tested using a random sample from the database. Conclusions: CAEs after noncardiac operations are relatively infrequent but highly lethal. Operation type and urgency and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status assessment are important independent predictors of cardiac morbidity, but angina, recent MI, and earlier cardiac operation are not. A prediction scoring system based on the Patient Safety in Surgery Study multivariable odds ratios is likely to be predictive of future events in a similar population requiring noncardiac procedures. This risk model can also serve as a tool to measure quality and effectiveness of care by providers who perform noncardiac operations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1199-1210 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of the American College of Surgeons |
Volume | 204 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2007 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This article is part of a group of articles from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, a demonstration project between the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American College of Surgeons in selected private-sector hospitals, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, grant number 5U18HS011913, entitled “Reporting System to Improve Patient Safety in Surgery.” The Patient Safety in Surgery Study led to the successful formation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. This article represents the personal viewpoints of the authors and cannot be construed as a statement of official policy of the American College of Surgeons, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the US government.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine