Abstract
Root uptake and translocation of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) by plants are dependent on both plant species and NP physicochemical properties. To evaluate the influence of NP surface charge and differences in root structure and vasculature on cerium distribution and spatial distribution within plants, two monocotyledons (corn and rice) and two dicotyledons (tomato and lettuce) were exposed hydroponically to positively-charged, negatively-charged, and neutral ∼4 nm CeO2 NPs. Leaves were analyzed using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy to provide lateral Ce spatial distribution. Surface charge mediated CeO2 NP interactions with roots for all plant species. Positively charged CeO2 NPs associated to the roots more than the negatively charged NPs due to electrostatic attraction/repulsion to the negatively charged root surfaces, with the highest association for the tomato, likely due to higher root surface area. The positive NPs remained primarily adhered to the roots untransformed, while the neutral and negative NPs were more efficiently translocated from the roots to shoots. This translocation efficiency was highest for the tomato and lettuce compared to corn and rice. Across all plant species, the positive and neutral treatments resulted in the formation of Ce clusters outside of the main vasculature in the mesophyll, while the negative treatment resulted in Ce primarily in the main vasculature of the leaves. Comparing leaf vasculature, Ce was able to move much further outside of the main vasculature in the dicot plants than monocot plants, likely due to the larger airspace volume in dicot leaves compared to monocot leaves. These results provide valuable insight into the influence of plant structure and NP properties on metal transport and distribution of NPs in plants.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2508-2519 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Environmental Science: Nano |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under NSF Cooperative Agreement EF-1266252, Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT), Nano for Agriculturally Relevant Materials (NanoFARM) (CBET-1530563), and from the NSF Integrated Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Nanotechnology Environmental Effects and Policy (IGERT-NEEP) (DGE-0966227). Parts of this research used the XFM and SRX Beamlines of the National Synchrotron Light Source II, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. A. S. A was supported by a DOE-Geosciences Grant (DE-FG02-92ER14244). We thank J. Thieme for his help running the SRX beamline at NSLS-II. Bulk XAS on root tissue was performed on Beamline 11-2 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL). We thank Jieran Li for synthesis of the NPs.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
US DOE Office of Science | |
DOE-Geosciences | DE-FG02-92ER14244 |
IGERT-NEEP | DGE-0966227 |
NSF Integrated Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Nanotechnology Environmental Effects and Policy | |
U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) | |
National Science Foundation (NSF) | |
Michigan State University-U.S. Department of Energy (MSU-DOE) Plant Research Laboratory | |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | EF-1266252 |
Office of Science Programs | |
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) | |
Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT) | CBET-1530563 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science (miscellaneous)
- General Environmental Science