Abstract
Deposition of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) in various environmental compartments is projected to continue rising exponentially. Terrestrial environments are expected to be the largest repository for environmentally released ENMs. Because ENMs are enriched in biosolids during wastewater treatment, agriculturally applied biosolids facilitate ENM exposure of key soil micro-organisms, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The ecological ramifications of increasing levels of ENM exposure of terrestrial micro-organisms are not clearly understood, but a growing body of research has investigated the toxicity of ENMs to various soil bacteria using a myriad of toxicity end-points and experimental procedures. This review explores what is known regarding ENM toxicity to important soil bacteria, with a focus on ENMs which are expected to accumulate in terrestrial ecosystems at the highest concentrations and pose the greatest potential threat to soil micro-organisms having potential indirect detrimental effects on plant growth. Knowledge gaps in the fundamental understanding of nanotoxicity to bacteria are identified, including the role of physicochemical properties of ENMs in toxicity responses, particularly in agriculturally relevant micro-organisms. Strategies for improving the impact of future research through the implementation of in-depth ENM characterization and use of necessary experimental controls are proposed. The future of nanotoxicological research employing microbial ecoreceptors is also explored, highlighting the need for continued research utilizing bacterial isolates while concurrently expanding efforts to study ENM–bacteria interactions in more complex environmentally relevant media, e.g. soil. Additionally, the particular importance of future work to extensively examine nanotoxicity in the context of bacterial ecosystem function, especially of plant growth-promoting agents, is proposed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 392-428 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | Nanotoxicology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 16 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
This work was funded, in part, by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program, the Transatlantic Initiative for Nanotechnology and the Environment (RD834574). Additional funding was received from the EPA and the National Science Foundation (NSF) under NSF Cooperative Agreement EF-0830093, Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EPA or NSF. This work has not been subjected to EPA or NSF review and no official endorsement should be inferred. The support from CSIRO Land and Water to Paul Bertsch is gratefully acknowledged.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | EF-0830093 |
| National Science Foundation Arctic Social Science Program | |
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | RD834574 |
| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | |
| Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT) | |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation |
Keywords
- Environmental nanotoxicology
- engineered nanomaterials (ENMs)
- metal toxicity
- nanoparticle toxicity
- plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biomedical Engineering
- Toxicology
