TY - JOUR
T1 - Narrow Framing and Retirement Savings Decisions
AU - Shin, Serah
AU - Kim, Hyungsoo
AU - Heath, Claudia J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright 2018 by The American Council on Consumer Interests
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Theoretical studies suggest narrow framing underlies individuals' saving decisions. When narrow framing is applied to retirement savings decisions, narrow framers tend to make decisions about present consumption without considering future consumption, i.e., saving for consumption in retirement. Time preference for the present and narrow framers' preference to maintain the status quo lead to a decision that is less likely to increase savings for retirement. This study provides empirical evidence that narrow framing bias affects retirement savings decisions. Using a two-part model, the probit estimation indicates narrow framers anticipated being less willing to increase retirement savings contributions compared to broad framers, and the OLS regression estimates that narrow framers anticipated contributing less than broad framers. Here, narrow framers anticipated being less willing to increase retirement savings (62.6% vs. 71.9%) and contributing less ($70.90 vs. $88.40) than broad framers, thus providing empirical evidence regarding the effects of behavioral biases on financial decisions.
AB - Theoretical studies suggest narrow framing underlies individuals' saving decisions. When narrow framing is applied to retirement savings decisions, narrow framers tend to make decisions about present consumption without considering future consumption, i.e., saving for consumption in retirement. Time preference for the present and narrow framers' preference to maintain the status quo lead to a decision that is less likely to increase savings for retirement. This study provides empirical evidence that narrow framing bias affects retirement savings decisions. Using a two-part model, the probit estimation indicates narrow framers anticipated being less willing to increase retirement savings contributions compared to broad framers, and the OLS regression estimates that narrow framers anticipated contributing less than broad framers. Here, narrow framers anticipated being less willing to increase retirement savings (62.6% vs. 71.9%) and contributing less ($70.90 vs. $88.40) than broad framers, thus providing empirical evidence regarding the effects of behavioral biases on financial decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052828319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052828319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joca.12211
DO - 10.1111/joca.12211
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052828319
SN - 0022-0078
VL - 53
SP - 975
EP - 997
JO - Journal of Consumer Affairs
JF - Journal of Consumer Affairs
IS - 3
ER -