TY - JOUR
T1 - NAV-Edge
T2 - Edge detection of potential-field sources using normalized anisotropy variance
AU - Zhang, Heng Lei
AU - Ravat, Dhananjay
AU - Marangoni, Yara R.
AU - Hu, Xiang Yun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/4/10
Y1 - 2014/4/10
N2 - Most existing edge-detection algorithms are based on the derivatives of potential-field data, and thus, enhance high wavenumber information and are sensitive to noise. The normalized anisotropy variance method (NAV-Edge) was proposed for detecting edges of potential-field anomaly sources based on the idea of normalized standard deviation (NSTD). The main improvement over the balanced, windowed normalized variance method (i.e., NSTD) used for similar purposes was the application of an anisotropic Gaussian function designed to detect directional edges and reduce sensitivity to noise. NAV-Edge did not directly use higher-order derivatives and was less sensitive to noise than the traditional methods that use derivatives in their calculation. The utility of NAVEdge was demonstrated using synthetic potential-field data and real magnetic data. Compared with several existing methods (i.e., the curvature of horizontal gradient amplitude, tilt angle and its total-horizontal derivative, theta map, and NSTD), NAV-Edge produced superior results by locating edges closer to the true edges, resulting in better interpretive images.
AB - Most existing edge-detection algorithms are based on the derivatives of potential-field data, and thus, enhance high wavenumber information and are sensitive to noise. The normalized anisotropy variance method (NAV-Edge) was proposed for detecting edges of potential-field anomaly sources based on the idea of normalized standard deviation (NSTD). The main improvement over the balanced, windowed normalized variance method (i.e., NSTD) used for similar purposes was the application of an anisotropic Gaussian function designed to detect directional edges and reduce sensitivity to noise. NAV-Edge did not directly use higher-order derivatives and was less sensitive to noise than the traditional methods that use derivatives in their calculation. The utility of NAVEdge was demonstrated using synthetic potential-field data and real magnetic data. Compared with several existing methods (i.e., the curvature of horizontal gradient amplitude, tilt angle and its total-horizontal derivative, theta map, and NSTD), NAV-Edge produced superior results by locating edges closer to the true edges, resulting in better interpretive images.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923209146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923209146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1190/GEO2013-0218.1
DO - 10.1190/GEO2013-0218.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84923209146
SN - 0016-8033
VL - 79
SP - J43-J53
JO - Geophysics
JF - Geophysics
IS - 3
ER -