TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative Media Coverage of the Supreme Court
T2 - The Interactive Role of Opinion Language, Coalition Size, and Ideological Signals
AU - Denison, Alexander
AU - Wedeking, Justin
AU - Zilis, Michael A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the Southwestern Social Science Association
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Objective: We offer a novel consideration of how judicial behavior influences Court coverage, examining when the media use negative language to cover the Supreme Court, and the consequences of this portrayal. Methods: Regression analysis to examine over 1,000 news articles from 29 diverse outlets covering rulings from the 2014 term, using text-based measures of the Court and media's negative coverage. Results: We find that the Court sends an important signal of conflict when using negative language in its decisions, leading to increases in negativity in subsequent coverage. We also show that this effect is conditional upon both the degree of consensus and ideological signals the Court sends when it rules. Conclusion: The media's treatment of the Supreme Court is in many ways a product of the conflict and ideological positioning that can be observed from the Court's rulings. It suggests that Court signals can attenuate media slant.
AB - Objective: We offer a novel consideration of how judicial behavior influences Court coverage, examining when the media use negative language to cover the Supreme Court, and the consequences of this portrayal. Methods: Regression analysis to examine over 1,000 news articles from 29 diverse outlets covering rulings from the 2014 term, using text-based measures of the Court and media's negative coverage. Results: We find that the Court sends an important signal of conflict when using negative language in its decisions, leading to increases in negativity in subsequent coverage. We also show that this effect is conditional upon both the degree of consensus and ideological signals the Court sends when it rules. Conclusion: The media's treatment of the Supreme Court is in many ways a product of the conflict and ideological positioning that can be observed from the Court's rulings. It suggests that Court signals can attenuate media slant.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073956755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073956755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ssqu.12732
DO - 10.1111/ssqu.12732
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85073956755
SN - 0038-4941
VL - 101
SP - 121
EP - 143
JO - Social Science Quarterly
JF - Social Science Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -