Net neutrality, the fairness doctrine, and the NRB: The tension between United States religious expression and media regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article analyzes the historical continuity between the opposition of the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) to the Fairness Doctrine (1949) and to the contemporary Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Open Internet principle, net neutrality. These debates demonstrate how media policy discourse has shaped democratic ideals, including by designating whose voices are or are not included in broadcast and digital communication spaces. The discourse emerging from both media policy debates reveals that fears concerning cultural hegemony and the diversity of expression in the United States have intertwined with fears concerning the invasion of foreign ideologies. The article then considers the possibility of reconciling religious and secular discourse in the mediated public sphere.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-12
Number of pages8
JournalMedia and Communication
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the author; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).

Keywords

  • Evangelicals
  • Fairness doctrine
  • Federal communications commission
  • Media regulation
  • National religious broadcasters
  • Net neutrality
  • Public sphere
  • Radio
  • Religion
  • Secularism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Net neutrality, the fairness doctrine, and the NRB: The tension between United States religious expression and media regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this