Neurocognitive Intraindividual Variability in Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury History and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Holly K. Rau, David P. Sheppard, Justin E. Karr, Rebecca C. Hendrickson, Abigail Schindler, Elaine R. Peskind, Kathleen F. Pagulayan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Veterans with a history of blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be at risk for greater cognitive concerns and worse functional outcomes compared to those with either condition in isolation. However, traditional neuropsychological assessment approaches have yielded equivocal results in these populations. The present study examined an alternative method for detecting subtle cognitive inefficiencies: neurocognitive intraindividual variability (IIV), a measure of within-person performance consistency. Method: Participants were 79 male Veterans with a history of blast-related mTBI and current PTSD (mTBI/PTSD group; n = 54) or neither diagnosis (controls; n = 25). Mean T-scores and IIV scores were calculated from neuropsychological measures of attention and speed of information processing (A/SoP) as well as executive functioning (EF). Results: Global IIV was significantly higher in the mTBI/PTSD group compared to controls (p =. 047, Cohen's d = 0.49). At the domain level, larger effect sizes were observed for EF IIV (Cohen's d = 0.46) compared to A/SoP IIV (d = 0.32), although neither were statistically significant. Within the mTBI/PTSD group, higher Global IIV was associated with worse self-reported executive dysfunction, psychological quality of life, and cognitive post-concussive symptoms; at the domain level, these clinical outcomes were generally associated with greater A/SoP IIV (but not EF IIV). Conclusion: Findings extend previous investigations of neurocognitive IIV in individuals with a history of mTBI across PTSD status. Among Veterans with a history of mTBI and comorbid PTSD, neurocognitive variability may be a better indicator of self-reported cognitive inefficiencies and Veteran experience of daily cognitive functioning than mean neuropsychological performances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-436
Number of pages12
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Published by Oxford University Press.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Merit Review Awards I01 RX00521 and I01 RX001612 (to ERP) and VA Clinical Sciences Research and Development Service Career Development Award IK2CX001774 (to RCH) as well as resources from the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations and the Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment (DPS), and the VA Northwest Network Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (HKR, DPS, RCH, AS, ERP, KFP).

FundersFunder number
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment
VA Northwest Network Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
Rehabilitation Research and Development ServiceI01 RX00521, I01 RX001612
Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
VA Clinical Sciences Research and Development ServiceIK2CX001774

    Keywords

    • Attention
    • Cognitive symptoms
    • Executive function
    • Neuropsychological tests
    • Posttraumatic stress disorder
    • Veteran health

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neurocognitive Intraindividual Variability in Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury History and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this