Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Neurofeedback for obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized, double-blind trial

  • Mariela Rance
  • , Zhiying Zhao
  • , Brian Zaboski
  • , Stephen A. Kichuk
  • , Emma Romaker
  • , William N. Koller
  • , Christopher Walsh
  • , Cheyenne Harris-Starling
  • , Suzanne Wasylink
  • , Thomas Adams
  • , Patricia Gruner
  • , Christopher Pittenger
  • , Michelle Hampson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We aim to develop fMRI neurofeedback as a treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). In prior work, we found that providing neurofeedback of activity in the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) improved control over contamination anxiety in a subclinical population. Here, we present the results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial (NCT02206945) testing this intervention in patients with OCD. We recruited patients with primary symptoms in the fear-of-harm/checking or contamination/washing domains. During neurofeedback, they viewed symptom provocative images and attempted to up- and down-regulate the aPFC during different blocks of time. The active group received two sessions of neurofeedback and the control group received yoked sham feedback. The primary outcome measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom scale. The secondary outcome was control over aPFC. Thirty-six participants completed feedback training (18 active, 18 control). The active group had a slightly but significantly greater reduction of obsessive-compulsive symptoms after neurofeedback compared to the control group (p<.05) but no significant differences in control over the aPFC. These data demonstrate that neurofeedback targeting the aPFC can reduce symptoms in OCD. Future investigations should seek to optimize the training protocol to yield larger effects and to clarify the mechanism of action.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115458
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume328
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Funding

This work was supported by NIMH ( R01 MH100068 , M. Hampson; K24 MH121571 , C. Pittenger), the state of Connecticut through its support of the Ribicoff Research Facilities at the Connecticut Mental Health Center, and by the Taylor Family Foundation (C. Pittenger). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the State of Connecticut, or other sponsors . This work was supported by NIMH (R01 MH100068, M. Hampson; K24 MH121571, C. Pittenger), the state of Connecticut through its support of the Ribicoff Research Facilities at the Connecticut Mental Health Center, and by the Taylor Family Foundation (C. Pittenger). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the State of Connecticut, or other sponsors.

FundersFunder number
Connecticut Mental Health Center
Taylor Family Foundation
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Mental HealthR01 MH100068, K24 MH121571
National Institute of Mental Health
Southern Connecticut State University

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Biofeedback
    • Neurofeedback
    • OCD
    • Obsessive compulsive disorder
    • rt-fMRI

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health
    • Biological Psychiatry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neurofeedback for obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized, double-blind trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this