Abstract
Introduction: We compared peak and submaximal mean values for neuromuscular and metabolic parameters between ramp (15 W·min-1) and step (30 W increments every 2 min) incremental cycle ergometer tests. Methods: Thirteen healthy adults (7 men and 6 women; mean ± SD age = 23.4 ± 3.3 years) performed randomly ordered ramp or step incremental tests. Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were used to analyze the data. Results: The ramp incremental test resulted in lower mean EMG amplitude, O2, and HR values at the common power outputs, with no differences for MMG amplitude values. Conclusions: It is possible that the cumulative effect of producing an increased amount of work during the step (total work = 75.83 kJ) vs. ramp (total work = 65.60 kJ) incremental cycle ergometer tests at the common power outputs may have contributed to the greater fatigue-induced increase in muscle recruitment and/or firing rate, oxygen consumption, and heart rate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-560 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Muscle and Nerve |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2013 |
Keywords
- Cycling
- Electromyography
- Exercise testing
- Graded exercise
- Mechanomyography
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Clinical Neurology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Physiology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Neuromuscular and metabolic comparisons between ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver