Neuromuscular and metabolic comparisons between ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests

  • Jorge M. Zuniga
  • , Terry J. Housh
  • , Clayton L. Camic
  • , Haley C. Bergstrom
  • , Daniel A. Traylor
  • , Richard J. Schmidt
  • , Glen O. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: We compared peak and submaximal mean values for neuromuscular and metabolic parameters between ramp (15 W·min-1) and step (30 W increments every 2 min) incremental cycle ergometer tests. Methods: Thirteen healthy adults (7 men and 6 women; mean ± SD age = 23.4 ± 3.3 years) performed randomly ordered ramp or step incremental tests. Two-way repeated measures analyses of variance were used to analyze the data. Results: The ramp incremental test resulted in lower mean EMG amplitude, O2, and HR values at the common power outputs, with no differences for MMG amplitude values. Conclusions: It is possible that the cumulative effect of producing an increased amount of work during the step (total work = 75.83 kJ) vs. ramp (total work = 65.60 kJ) incremental cycle ergometer tests at the common power outputs may have contributed to the greater fatigue-induced increase in muscle recruitment and/or firing rate, oxygen consumption, and heart rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-560
Number of pages6
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Keywords

  • Cycling
  • Electromyography
  • Exercise testing
  • Graded exercise
  • Mechanomyography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neuromuscular and metabolic comparisons between ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this