TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuromuscular compensatory strategies at the trunk and lower limb are not resolved following an ACL reconstruction
AU - Boggess, Grant
AU - Morgan, Kristin
AU - Johnson, Darren
AU - Ireland, Mary Lloyd
AU - Reinbolt, Jeffrey A.
AU - Noehren, Brian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Background Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients present with greater trunk ipsilateral lean, which may affect knee kinetics and increase re-injury risk. However, there has been little research into neuromuscular factors controlling the trunk and their relation to the knee between healthy and ACLR subjects. This is critical to establish in order to develop more directed and effective interventions. Hypothesis As compared to healthy control subjects, ACLR subjects will demonstrate increased erector spinae and rectus abdominis co-contraction, greater rectus abdominis force and greater hamstring force that is correlated to increased forward trunk lean. Study design Cross-sectional study, Level of Evidence: 3. Methods Eleven healthy and eleven ACLR subjects were matched for age, mass and height. Subjects were asked to run at a self-selected speed while instrumented gait analysis was performed. An anthropometrically scaled OpenSim model was created for each subject. Trunk and hamstring muscle forces from Static Optimization were analyzed at impact peak. Additionally, directed co-contraction ratios were calculated for the erector spinae and erector spinae/rectus abdominis combinations. Results ACLR subjects showed more balanced erector spinae co-contraction [p < 0.01], and greater hamstring force [biceps femoris long head (p = 0.02), semimembranosus (0.01), semitendinosus (0.01)]. There was no statistical difference for any other muscle group. Conclusion Despite release to return to sport, ACLR subjects are continuing to increase the stiffness of their trunk as well increase their hamstring force to potentially reduce anterior tibial translation. Clinical relevance Clinicians may anticipate ACLR subjects using their erector spinae and hamstrings to maintain a sense of stability in their trunk and at their knee.
AB - Background Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), patients present with greater trunk ipsilateral lean, which may affect knee kinetics and increase re-injury risk. However, there has been little research into neuromuscular factors controlling the trunk and their relation to the knee between healthy and ACLR subjects. This is critical to establish in order to develop more directed and effective interventions. Hypothesis As compared to healthy control subjects, ACLR subjects will demonstrate increased erector spinae and rectus abdominis co-contraction, greater rectus abdominis force and greater hamstring force that is correlated to increased forward trunk lean. Study design Cross-sectional study, Level of Evidence: 3. Methods Eleven healthy and eleven ACLR subjects were matched for age, mass and height. Subjects were asked to run at a self-selected speed while instrumented gait analysis was performed. An anthropometrically scaled OpenSim model was created for each subject. Trunk and hamstring muscle forces from Static Optimization were analyzed at impact peak. Additionally, directed co-contraction ratios were calculated for the erector spinae and erector spinae/rectus abdominis combinations. Results ACLR subjects showed more balanced erector spinae co-contraction [p < 0.01], and greater hamstring force [biceps femoris long head (p = 0.02), semimembranosus (0.01), semitendinosus (0.01)]. There was no statistical difference for any other muscle group. Conclusion Despite release to return to sport, ACLR subjects are continuing to increase the stiffness of their trunk as well increase their hamstring force to potentially reduce anterior tibial translation. Clinical relevance Clinicians may anticipate ACLR subjects using their erector spinae and hamstrings to maintain a sense of stability in their trunk and at their knee.
KW - ACL reconstruction
KW - OpenSim
KW - Running
KW - Trunk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034456330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034456330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.014
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 29169096
AN - SCOPUS:85034456330
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 60
SP - 81
EP - 87
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -