Nitrate removal by floating treatment wetlands amended with spent coffee: A mesocosm-scale evaluation

M. G. Keilhauer, T. L. Messer, A. R. Mittelstet, T. G. Franti, J. R. Corman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Midwestern U.S. is vulnerable to eutrophic conditions from high nutrient concentrations. Floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) are an innovative wetland design for nutrient removal from nonpoint sources and provide a unique in situ treatment. The objectives of this project were to quantify nitrate removal in traditional and carbon-amended FTWs planted with Midwestern plant species during the establishment year. Three greenhouse experiments were conducted throughout the growing season using 18 mesocosms. Two vegetation designs were evaluated: rush species (Juncus effusus and Juncus torreyi) and diverse species (Carex comosa, Carex vulpinoidea, Asclepias incarnata, J. effusus, J. torreyi, and Iris virginica). Spent coffee grounds were applied to 9 of the 18 mesocosms as a carbon amendment. Nitrate-N removal increased during the establishment growing season in the FTW systems (Spring: 15.0% to 17.3%, Summer 1: 82.8% to 92.6%, Summer 2: 86.4% to 94.7%). Nitrate-N removal was also impacted by carbon amendments (FTW without amendment: 82.8% to 94.7%, FTW with amendment: 88.4% to 96.1%). Carbon additions were found to enhance denitrifying conditions even in the absence of FTWs (decreased dissolved oxygen, increased available organic carbon). Significant differences in nitrate-N removal were not observed between FTW vegetation designs. This study provides new insight on the impacts of the growing season, plant species, and carbon amendments on FTW nitrate-N removal performance during the establishment year.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1619-1630
Number of pages12
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume62
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

Funding

This project was supported with funding from the Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. This project is based on research that was partially supported by the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station with funding from the Hatch capacity funding program (Accession No. 1014685) of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Collaborators from the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality made this project possible. Special thanks to Alexa Davis, Autumn Dunn, Rob Schroeder, and Sam Hansen for sampling and laboratory assistance.

FundersFunder number
Alexa Davis
Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality
US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research Initiative
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station1014685
Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station

    Keywords

    • Best management practices
    • Carbon amendment
    • Floating treatment wetlands
    • Nitrogen removal
    • Spent coffee grounds

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Forestry
    • Food Science
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Agronomy and Crop Science
    • Soil Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrate removal by floating treatment wetlands amended with spent coffee: A mesocosm-scale evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this