Abstract
Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced operant task to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline. After discrimination training stabilized, test doses of (+)-amphetamine (0.0625-2.0 mg/kg), (-)-nicotine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or (-)-nornicotine (1-10 mg/kg) were assessed for their ability to substitute for the (+)-amphetamine training dose during brief test sessions in which food reinforcement was withheld. As expected, as the test dose of (+)-amphetamine increased, there was a dose-related increase in drug-appropriate responding, with both 1 and 2 mg/kg test doses substituting fully for the (+)-amphetamine training dose. Both (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine showed partial substitution (approximately 50% drug-appropriate responding) for the (+)-amphetamine training dose, with (-)-nicotine being more potent than (-)-nornicotine. Rate suppressant effects prevented the assessment of higher doses of (-)-nicotine or (-)-nornicotine. Thus, while (-)-nicotine and (-)-nornicotine share similar discriminative stimulus properties, the mechanism that mediates this effect appears to differ, at least in part, from that activated by (+)-amphetamine.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1083-1087 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1997 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported in part by grants from the Tobacco & Health Research Institute (Lexington, KY) and the National Institutes on Health (DA 05312). The expert technical assistance of M. Marion and consultation of J. Rowlett is appreciated.
Keywords
- Amphetamine
- Discrimination stimulus
- Drug cue
- Drug discrimination
- Nicotine
- Nornicotine
- Rat
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry
- Toxicology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Biochemistry
- Biological Psychiatry
- Behavioral Neuroscience