Abstract
F. Leri and J. Stewart (2002) present convincing evidence that a relapse to heroin-seeking behavior is established when rats are given a momentary lapse in which they are allowed to respond while under the influence of heroin. Although exposure to a conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with heroin self-infusion did not induce a relapse, it was able to control responding. In addition to serving as both a discriminative stimulus and a conditioned reinforcer, it is argued in this article that the CS also may have positive hedonic value independent of its association with heroin and that this property should be considered in interpreting the results of future experiments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 353-355 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmacology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Pharmacology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the nature of the conditioned stimulus: Comment on Leri and Stewart (2002)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver