On the Pursuit of Sound Science for the Betterment of the American Indian Community: Reply to Beals et al. (2009)

Nichea S. Spillane, Gregory T. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The authors of this reply argue that ongoing criticism of existing theories, the development of alternative theories, and empirical theory tests offer the best chance for advancing American Indian research. The authors therefore note their appreciation for the comments of J. Beals et al. (2009). The authors nevertheless disagree with many of the specific claims of Beals et al., noting that in their original article (N. S. Spillane & G. T. Smith, 2007), (a) the characterization of the existing literature on reservation-dwelling American Indian drinking was accurate; (b) no argument made by Beals et al. undermines their theoretical contention that there is a relative lack of contingency between access to basic life reinforcers and sobriety on many reservations; (c) the theory was developed in a responsible manner, specifically by a reservation-tied American Indian, and was reviewed by a reservation leadership team, a cultural consultant, and reviewers for this journal, at least one of whom consulted leaders of other reservations; and (d) the theory was based on previous interdisciplinary theory development. The authors encourage the development and testing of new, alternative theories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-346
Number of pages3
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Keywords

  • American Indians
  • alcohol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Pursuit of Sound Science for the Betterment of the American Indian Community: Reply to Beals et al. (2009)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this