One Health, many approaches: integrated vector management strategies support One Health goals

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Integrated pest management (IPM) laid the foundation for integrated vector management (IVM) by introducing strategies that prioritize prevention over intervention and the use of diverse management and control tools for arthropod vectors. Both approaches focus on reducing chemical reliance for management of targeted organisms by employing data-driven decisions and incorporating the use of additional non-chemical based management tactics. While IPM and IVM differ in their specific applications and management contexts, many of their fundamental principles remain the same. By diversifying prevention and control options, these management practices support healthier environments, animals, and populace, the three spheres of the One Health paradigm. One Health principles support and highlight the connections between animal, human, and environmental health and how these spheres influence one another. However, the connections and overlapping goals between IVM and One Health are infrequently discussed in tandem. This review will examine the numerous and varied methods of IVM for reducing global disease burden, detail the benefits of using IVM to achieve One Health goals, as well as benefits and considerations to incorporating a One Health lens with IVM.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1549348
JournalFrontiers in Insect Science
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Tiffin, Gordon and Poh.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by startup support for HST through the Department of Entomology and Martin-Gatton College of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the University of Kentucky. JRG was supported by funding from Bug Lessons Consulting, LLC. This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (Project #2090-32000-040-000-D) for KCP. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by startup support for HST through the Department of Entomology and Martin-Gatton College of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the University of Kentucky. JRG was supported by funding from Bug Lessons Consulting, LLC. This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (Project #2090-32000-040-000-D) for KCP. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments

FundersFunder number
University of Kentucky
U.S. Department of Agriculture
USDA-Agricultural Research Service2090-32000-040-000-D

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • One Health
    • integrated vector management
    • pest management
    • vector control
    • vector-borne disease

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Insect Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'One Health, many approaches: integrated vector management strategies support One Health goals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this