Abstract
Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is a key strategy for addressing the opioid use disorder crisis, yet gaps in MOUD provision impede this strategy’s benefits. The research reported here sought to understand what distinguishes low- and high-performing organizations in building and using capacity to provide MOUD. As part of a mixed methods MOUD implementation trial, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with personnel from low- and high-performing MOUD-providing organizations. Seventeen individuals from 17 organizations were interviewed. Findings demonstrate the importance of individual, organization, and community-level factors in supporting the building and use of MOUD capacity. Low- and high-performing organizations showed different patterns of facilitators and barriers during the implementation process. The key difference between low- and high-performing organizations was the level of organizational functioning. A better understanding of an organization’s assets and deficits at the individual, organizational, and community levels would allow decision-makers to tailor their approaches to MOUD implementation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 439-448 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA Grant R01DA030431; PI: Molfenter). Acknowledgments
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, National Council for Behavioral Health.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Health Policy
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health