TY - JOUR
T1 - Orientation and mobility remote instruction during COVID-19
T2 - Best practices, liability, and ethics
AU - Welch-Grenier, Stephanie
AU - Fast, Danene
AU - Kaiser, Justin
AU - DeGrant, Jasamyn N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - This research evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on orientation and mobility (O&M) services for school-aged students, families, and service providers. The survey asked O&M specialists about their instructional practices and decision-making processes regarding remote instruction service provisions, allowances, and district guidelines. The online survey collected data from October to November 2020, with open-ended responses from 166 O&M specialists. A thematic analysis was used to examine and code qualitative responses. Respondents were found to divide remote instruction into two categories, foundational skills and high-level travel skills. A preference for teaching foundational skills during remote instruction was also identified, with concerns for student safety and practitioner liability reported as the deciding factors. Field-specific guidelines and potential legal vulnerabilities regarding remote instruction are considered, with an analysis of negligence and professional liability. Practices used during COVID are also examined according to the COMS Code of Ethics and Scope of Practice. The findings demonstrate the need for field-specific guidance and research-based instructional methods regarding remote instruction. O&M specialists should continue to conduct a thorough risk assessment before utilizing new and unresearched remote instructional methods as a means of acting in the best interest of the student.
AB - This research evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on orientation and mobility (O&M) services for school-aged students, families, and service providers. The survey asked O&M specialists about their instructional practices and decision-making processes regarding remote instruction service provisions, allowances, and district guidelines. The online survey collected data from October to November 2020, with open-ended responses from 166 O&M specialists. A thematic analysis was used to examine and code qualitative responses. Respondents were found to divide remote instruction into two categories, foundational skills and high-level travel skills. A preference for teaching foundational skills during remote instruction was also identified, with concerns for student safety and practitioner liability reported as the deciding factors. Field-specific guidelines and potential legal vulnerabilities regarding remote instruction are considered, with an analysis of negligence and professional liability. Practices used during COVID are also examined according to the COMS Code of Ethics and Scope of Practice. The findings demonstrate the need for field-specific guidance and research-based instructional methods regarding remote instruction. O&M specialists should continue to conduct a thorough risk assessment before utilizing new and unresearched remote instructional methods as a means of acting in the best interest of the student.
KW - Code of ethics
KW - liability
KW - remote instruction
KW - risk
KW - scope of practice
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145223861
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145223861#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/02646196221144871
DO - 10.1177/02646196221144871
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145223861
SN - 0264-6196
VL - 42
SP - 435
EP - 444
JO - British Journal of Visual Impairment
JF - British Journal of Visual Impairment
IS - 2
ER -