TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Early Molecular Response at 3 and 6 Months
T2 - A Comparative Analysis of Generic Imatinib and Glivec
AU - Eskazan, Ahmet Emre
AU - Sadri, Sevil
AU - Keskin, Dilek
AU - Ayer, Mesut
AU - Kantarcioglu, Bulent
AU - Demirel, Naciye
AU - Aydin, Demet
AU - Aydinli, Fuat
AU - Yokus, Osman
AU - Ozunal, Isil Erdogan
AU - Berk, Selin
AU - Yalniz, Fevzi Firat
AU - Elverdi, Tugrul
AU - Salihoglu, Ayse
AU - Ar, Muhlis Cem
AU - Ongoren, Seniz
AU - Baslar, Zafer
AU - Aydin, Yildiz
AU - Tuzuner, Nukhet
AU - Ozbek, Ugur
AU - Soysal, Teoman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Micro-Abstract We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving either upfront original imatinib (OI) or generic imatinib (GI) for the effect of the early molecular response on the long-term outcome. We demonstrated that achieving an optimal response at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI or OI was clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Background The molecular response at 3 months of the original imatinib (OI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia has prognostic significance; however, this has never been tested for generic imatinib (GI). Patients and Methods We evaluated the BCR-ABL1 [international reporting scale (IS)] transcript levels at 3 and 6 months to determine whether an early molecular response (EMR) had a prognostic effect on the outcome among chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving GI. Ninety patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the imatinib they received, as OI (group A) and GI (group B). Results Two groups were equally balanced for age, gender, Sokal risk score, and optimal response. The 2 groups did not differ in achieving an EMR at 3 months, and patients with EMR at 3 months had significantly superior complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response rates compared with patients who did not achieve an EMR in both groups. The percentage of an optimal response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), < 1%] and a warning response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), 1%-10%] at 6 months was 93% and 95% for groups A and B, respectively (P =.553). Patients with an optimal response (OR) at both 3 and 6 months had significantly superior event-free survival rates compared with patients without an OR in groups A and B. Conclusion The results of the present study have demonstrated most probably for the first time that an OR at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI and OI is clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Prospective randomized trials with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are needed to address the effect of EMR in patients receiving GI.
AB - Micro-Abstract We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving either upfront original imatinib (OI) or generic imatinib (GI) for the effect of the early molecular response on the long-term outcome. We demonstrated that achieving an optimal response at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI or OI was clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Background The molecular response at 3 months of the original imatinib (OI) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia has prognostic significance; however, this has never been tested for generic imatinib (GI). Patients and Methods We evaluated the BCR-ABL1 [international reporting scale (IS)] transcript levels at 3 and 6 months to determine whether an early molecular response (EMR) had a prognostic effect on the outcome among chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving GI. Ninety patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the imatinib they received, as OI (group A) and GI (group B). Results Two groups were equally balanced for age, gender, Sokal risk score, and optimal response. The 2 groups did not differ in achieving an EMR at 3 months, and patients with EMR at 3 months had significantly superior complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response rates compared with patients who did not achieve an EMR in both groups. The percentage of an optimal response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), < 1%] and a warning response [BCR-ABL1 (IS), 1%-10%] at 6 months was 93% and 95% for groups A and B, respectively (P =.553). Patients with an optimal response (OR) at both 3 and 6 months had significantly superior event-free survival rates compared with patients without an OR in groups A and B. Conclusion The results of the present study have demonstrated most probably for the first time that an OR at 3 and 6 months in patients receiving either first-line GI and OI is clearly associated with greater response and event-free survival rates. Prospective randomized trials with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are needed to address the effect of EMR in patients receiving GI.
KW - BCR-ABL1
KW - CML
KW - Generic imatinib
KW - Outcome
KW - Response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028363740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028363740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.255
DO - 10.1016/j.clml.2017.07.255
M3 - Article
C2 - 28847475
AN - SCOPUS:85028363740
SN - 2152-2650
VL - 17
SP - 804
EP - 811
JO - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
JF - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
IS - 12
ER -