TY - JOUR
T1 - Paclobutrazol drench activity not affected in sphagnum peat-based substrates amended with pine wood chip aggregates
AU - Garrett Owen, W.
AU - Jackson, Brian E.
AU - Whipker, Brian E.
AU - Fonteno, William C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the American Society for Horticultural Science.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - Processed pine (Pinus sp.) wood has been investigated as a component in horticultural substrates (greenhouse and nursery) for many years. Specifically, pine wood chips (PWC) have been uniquely engineered/processed into a nonfiberous blockular particle size, suitable for use as a substrate aggregate. The purpose of this research was to determine if paclobutrazol drench efficacy is affected by PWC used as a substitute for perlite in a peat-based substrate. Paclobutrazol drench applications of 0, 1, 2, and 4 mg/potwere applied to ‘PacinoGold’ sunflower (Helianthus annuus); 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 mg/pot to ‘Anemone Safari Yellow’marigold (Tagetes patula); and 0.0, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.50 mg/pot to ‘Variegata’ plectranthus (Plectranthus ciliates) grown in sphagnum peat-based substrates containing 10%, 20%, or 30% (by volume) perlite or PWC. Efficacy of paclobutrazol drenches for controlling growth of all three species was unaffected by substrate composition. We concluded that substitutingPWCfor perlite as an aggregate in peat-based substrates should not reduce paclobutrazol drench efficacy, variability in PWC products indicates that efficacy should be tested before large-scale use. The variability results from wood components not being engineered and processed the same across manufacturers, meaning that they are often incapable of improving/influencing the physical and chemical behavior of a substrate similarly.
AB - Processed pine (Pinus sp.) wood has been investigated as a component in horticultural substrates (greenhouse and nursery) for many years. Specifically, pine wood chips (PWC) have been uniquely engineered/processed into a nonfiberous blockular particle size, suitable for use as a substrate aggregate. The purpose of this research was to determine if paclobutrazol drench efficacy is affected by PWC used as a substitute for perlite in a peat-based substrate. Paclobutrazol drench applications of 0, 1, 2, and 4 mg/potwere applied to ‘PacinoGold’ sunflower (Helianthus annuus); 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 mg/pot to ‘Anemone Safari Yellow’marigold (Tagetes patula); and 0.0, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.50 mg/pot to ‘Variegata’ plectranthus (Plectranthus ciliates) grown in sphagnum peat-based substrates containing 10%, 20%, or 30% (by volume) perlite or PWC. Efficacy of paclobutrazol drenches for controlling growth of all three species was unaffected by substrate composition. We concluded that substitutingPWCfor perlite as an aggregate in peat-based substrates should not reduce paclobutrazol drench efficacy, variability in PWC products indicates that efficacy should be tested before large-scale use. The variability results from wood components not being engineered and processed the same across manufacturers, meaning that they are often incapable of improving/influencing the physical and chemical behavior of a substrate similarly.
KW - Horticultural substrates
KW - Loblolly pine
KW - PGR
KW - Plant growth regulator
KW - Potting media
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964556754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964556754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21273/horttech.26.2.156
DO - 10.21273/horttech.26.2.156
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84964556754
SN - 1063-0198
VL - 26
SP - 156
EP - 163
JO - HortTechnology
JF - HortTechnology
IS - 2
ER -