Abstract
This article describes a case study of the policy development and political decision-making process involved in the enactment of Lexington, Kentucky’s smoke-free law. The multiple streams framework is used to analyze the development of the law in a seemingly unlikely and challenging political environment. Proponents developed a dissemination research plan targeted at policy makers and the public to demonstrate the need for a comprehensive law. The existence of a strong coalition of health care providers and health care systems including the board of health, as well as long-standing tobacco control expertise and a strong legal team, were essential ingredients for success. A deliberate strategy to expose the tobacco industry was effective in preparing policy makers for the opponents’ policy arguments. As expected, a hospitality industry association was formed to oppose the ordinance, resulting in a legal challenge that delayed enactment of the law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-220 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- no-smoking laws
- policy development
- secondhand smoke
- tobacco policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Leadership and Management
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Passing a Smoke-Free Law in a Pro-Tobacco Culture: A Multiple Streams Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver