TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase
AU - Pratt, Michael C.
AU - Kluemper, G. Thomas
AU - Lindstrom, Adam F.
PY - 2011/8
Y1 - 2011/8
N2 - Introduction: Retention is an important, even critical, component of orthodontic treatment. There is little research on practice protocols and patient compliance with long-term or short-term retention. This lack of information leaves our specialty with many opinions and practice protocols. The purposes of this study were to evaluate and quantify orthodontic retainer wear according to several variables, including patient age, sex, time in retention, and retainer type, and to identify predictors of compliance and reasons for noncompliance with removable orthodontic retainers. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to patients who finished full fixed appliance therapy in either the orthodontic graduate clinic or the orthodontic faculty practice at the University of Kentucky within the past 6 years. Of the 1085 questionnaires mailed, 280 were returned (25.8%). A logistic regression model that described the probabilities of retainer wear was created (P <0.0001). Results: Patient compliance was greater with vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) for the first 2 years after debonding. However, compliance with VFRs decreased at a much faster rate than with Hawley retainers. Because of this, patient compliance was greater with Hawley retainers at any time longer than 2 years after debonding, and patient compliance overall was greater with Hawley retainers. Conclusions: This evidence disagrees with the current anecdotal trend of orthodontists who favor switching from Hawley retainers to VFRs. An unexpected finding was that patients reported few esthetic concerns about retainers, and the few that were reported were equally distributed between Hawley retainers and VFRs.
AB - Introduction: Retention is an important, even critical, component of orthodontic treatment. There is little research on practice protocols and patient compliance with long-term or short-term retention. This lack of information leaves our specialty with many opinions and practice protocols. The purposes of this study were to evaluate and quantify orthodontic retainer wear according to several variables, including patient age, sex, time in retention, and retainer type, and to identify predictors of compliance and reasons for noncompliance with removable orthodontic retainers. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to patients who finished full fixed appliance therapy in either the orthodontic graduate clinic or the orthodontic faculty practice at the University of Kentucky within the past 6 years. Of the 1085 questionnaires mailed, 280 were returned (25.8%). A logistic regression model that described the probabilities of retainer wear was created (P <0.0001). Results: Patient compliance was greater with vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) for the first 2 years after debonding. However, compliance with VFRs decreased at a much faster rate than with Hawley retainers. Because of this, patient compliance was greater with Hawley retainers at any time longer than 2 years after debonding, and patient compliance overall was greater with Hawley retainers. Conclusions: This evidence disagrees with the current anecdotal trend of orthodontists who favor switching from Hawley retainers to VFRs. An unexpected finding was that patients reported few esthetic concerns about retainers, and the few that were reported were equally distributed between Hawley retainers and VFRs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961008997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961008997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.035
DO - 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 21803257
AN - SCOPUS:79961008997
SN - 0889-5406
VL - 140
SP - 196
EP - 201
JO - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
JF - American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
IS - 2
ER -