Abstract
Objective: To prospectively evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemoradiation (RT + CIS) versus radiation (RT) on quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with intermediate-risk, stage I-IIA cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Methods: Patients enrolled in GOG-0263 completed PRO/QOL assessments at baseline, 3, 7, and 36 weeks using the FACT-Cx Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Cx TOI), FACT/GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx-4), the worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and five gastrointestinal/genitourinary (GI/GU) symptom items. Linear mixed models adjusted for baseline score, treatment, age, performance status, and country. Results: Among 316 randomized eligible patients (RT + CIS: n = 158; RT: n = 158), questionnaire completion rates were 98 %, 90 %, 88 %, and 81 % at baseline, weeks 3, 7, and 36, respectively. Patients receiving RT + CIS reported a mean FACT-Cx TOI score 5.1 points lower than RT at 3 weeks (97.5 % CI: −8.6 to −1.6; p = 0.004) and 6.3 points lower at 7 weeks (97.5 % CI: −10.2 to −2.4; p = 0.002). By 36 weeks, scores had returned to baseline in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.386). Patient-reported neuropathy scores (FACT/GOG-Ntx-4) did not differ significantly between groups at any time point (p = 0.82). Patient-reported GI/GU symptoms and pain worsened at 3 weeks in both arms, followed by recovery to baseline by 36 weeks. Conclusion: QOL declined in both groups after treatment initiation, with greater short-term deterioration in the RT + CIS group. By 36 weeks, QOL and other PROs returned to baseline in both groups. Neuropathy, GI/GU symptoms, and pain showed no significant differences between treatment arms over time.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 102-109 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Gynecologic Oncology |
| Volume | 202 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Authors
Funding
This study was supported by the following National Cancer Institute grants to NRG Oncology: U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC) and U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations).Dr. Charles A. Leath III's institution received NIH Grants – NIH UG1233330 and P50 CA098252. His institution provided Contracted Research from Agenus and Seattle Genetics. He received payment for Lecture Honorarium from Merck. He also received travel support for attending meetings from Merck. He participated in the Scientific Advisory Boards for Merck and Seattle Genetics. This study was supported by the following National Cancer Institute grants to NRG Oncology : U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC) and U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Merck | |
| National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute | U10CA180868, U10CA180822 |
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | P50 CA098252, UG1233330 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Adjuvant therapy
- Cervical cancer
- Chemoradiotherapy
- Patient-reported outcomes
- Quality of life
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported outcomes of a randomized phase III clinical trial of adjuvant radiation versus chemoradiation in intermediate risk, stage I/IIA cervical cancer patients treated with initial radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (NRG/GOG-0263)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver