TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry
T2 - Ready for Primetime?
AU - Rakesh, Gopalkumar
AU - Sumner, Calvin R.
AU - Alexander, Jeanne Leventhal
AU - Gross, Lawrence S.
AU - Pine, Janet
AU - Slaby, Andrew
AU - Garakani, Amir
AU - Baron, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Pharmacogenomic testing in clinical psychiatry has grown at an accelerated pace in the last few years and is poised to grow even further. Despite robust evidence lacking regarding efficacy in clinical use, there continues to be growing interest to use it to make treatment decisions. We intend this article to be a primer for a clinician wishing to understand the biological bases, evidence for benefits, and pitfalls in clinical decision-making. Using clinical vignettes, we elucidate these headings in addition to providing a perspective on current relevance, what can be communicated to patients, and future research directions. Overall, the evidence for pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry demonstrates strong analytical validity, modest clinical validity, and virtually no evidence to support clinical use. There is definitely a need for more double-blinded randomized controlled trials to assess the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical decision-making and care, and until this is done, they could perhaps have an adjunct role in clinical decision-making but minimal use in leading the initial treatment plan.
AB - Pharmacogenomic testing in clinical psychiatry has grown at an accelerated pace in the last few years and is poised to grow even further. Despite robust evidence lacking regarding efficacy in clinical use, there continues to be growing interest to use it to make treatment decisions. We intend this article to be a primer for a clinician wishing to understand the biological bases, evidence for benefits, and pitfalls in clinical decision-making. Using clinical vignettes, we elucidate these headings in addition to providing a perspective on current relevance, what can be communicated to patients, and future research directions. Overall, the evidence for pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry demonstrates strong analytical validity, modest clinical validity, and virtually no evidence to support clinical use. There is definitely a need for more double-blinded randomized controlled trials to assess the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical decision-making and care, and until this is done, they could perhaps have an adjunct role in clinical decision-making but minimal use in leading the initial treatment plan.
KW - Pharmacogenomic
KW - medications
KW - metabolism
KW - psychotropic
KW - psychotropic medications
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078560929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078560929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001107
DO - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001107
M3 - Article
C2 - 31895226
AN - SCOPUS:85078560929
SN - 0022-3018
VL - 208
SP - 127
EP - 130
JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
IS - 2
ER -