Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B

  • Amy S. Clark
  • , Fangxin Hong
  • , Richard S. Finn
  • , Angela M. DeMichele
  • , Edith P. Mitchell
  • , James Zwiebel
  • , Fernanda I. Arnaldez
  • , Robert J. Gray
  • , Victoria Wang
  • , Lisa M. McShane
  • , Larry V. Rubinstein
  • , David Patton
  • , P. Mickey Williams
  • , Stanley R. Hamilton
  • , Mehmet S. Copur
  • , Samer S. Kasbari
  • , Ravneet Thind
  • , Barbara A. Conley
  • , Carlos L. Arteaga
  • , Peter J. O’Dwyer
  • Lyndsay N. Harris, Alice P. Chen, Keith T. Flaherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Cyclin D/CDK4/6 is critical in controlling the G1 to S checkpoint. CCND, the gene encoding cyclin D, is known to be amplified in a variety of solid tumors. Palbociclib is an oral CDK4/6 inhibitor, approved in advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We explored the efficacy of palbociclib in patients with nonbreast solid tumors containing an amplification in CCND1, 2, or 3. Patients and Methods: Patients with tumors containing a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and expression of the retinoblastoma protein were assigned to subprotocol Z1B and received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles. Results: Forty patients were assigned to subprotocol Z1B; 4 patients had outside assays identifying the CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification and were not confirmed centrally; 3 were ineligible and 2 were not treated (1 untreated patient was also ineligible), leaving 32 evaluable patients for this analysis. There were no partial responses; 12 patients (37.5%) had stable disease as best response. There were seven deaths on study, all during cycle 1 and attributable to disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months. The most common toxicities were leukopenia (n ¼ 21, 55%) and neutropenia (n ¼ 19, 50%); neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 event (n ¼ 12, 32%). Conclusions: Palbociclib was not effective at treating nonbreast solid tumors with a CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification in this cohort. These data do not support further investigation of single-agent palbociclib in tumors with CCND1, 2, or 3 amplification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1483
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Funding

This study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O’Dwyer, MD, and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and supported by the NCI of the NIH under the following award numbers: U10CA180820, U10CA180794, UG1CA233341, UG1CA189809, U10CA180888, UG1CA189858, UG1CA233302, and UG1CA233180. Palbociclib was provided by Pfizer for this study. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. A.S. Clark reports grants from Novartis and Lilly outside the submitted work. R.S. Finn reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from AstraZeneca, Cstone, Exelixis, and Hengrui and grants and personal fees from Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Adaptimmune outside the submitted work. A.M. DeMichele reports grants from Pfizer, Novartis, and Genentech outside the submitted work; in addition, A.M. DeMichele’s spouse is on aPfizer data and safety monitoring board for a GI drug (non-oncology). E.P. Mitchell receives institutional research funding from Genentech and Sanofi; has served as a consultant or advisor to BMS, Genentech, Merck, and Novartis; has received honoraria from Exelixis and Sanofi; serves on the speakers bureau of Ipsen; and has a leadership role in Corvus Pharmaceuticals. F.I. Arnaldez reports other support from AstraZeneca, PLC outside the submitted work. R.J. Gray reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. V. Wang reports grants from NIH/NCI during the conduct of the study. S.R. Hamilton reports other support from ECOG-ACRIN during the conduct of the study. C.L. Artega reports grants from Pfizer, Lilly, and Takeda and personal fees from Novartis, Lilly, Taiho Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Merck, OrigiMed, Immunomedics, Susan G. Komen Foundation, and Arvinas outside the submitted work; in addition, C.L. Arteaga has a patent for Provista with royalties paid. P.J. O’Dwyer reports grants from Pfizer during the conduct of the study. K.T. Flaherty reports personal fees from Clovis Oncology, Strata Oncology, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Kinnate Biopharma, Scorpion Therapeutics, PIC Therapeutics, Apricity, Oncoceutics, Fog Pharma, Tvardi, xCures, Monopteros, Vibliome, ALX Oncology, OMRx, Soley Therapeutics, Quanta Therapeutics, Lilly, Genentech, and Takeda; grants and personal fees from Novartis; and grants from Sanofi during the conduct of the study. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.

FundersFunder number
U.S. Government
National Institutes of Health (NIH)U10CA180820, UG1CA233302, U10CA180794, UG1CA189809, UG1CA233180, UG1CA233341, U10CA180888, UG1CA189858
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute
Pfizer
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Susan G Komen Foundation

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Cancer Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phase II Study of Palbociclib (PD-0332991) in CCND1, 2, or 3 Amplification: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1B'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this