TY - JOUR
T1 - Phylogenetic patterns of trait and trait plasticity evolution
T2 - Insights from amphibian embryos
AU - Relyea, Rick A.
AU - Stephens, Patrick R.
AU - Barrow, Lisa N.
AU - Blaustein, Andrew R.
AU - Bradley, Paul W.
AU - Buck, Julia C.
AU - Chang, Ann
AU - Collins, James P.
AU - Crother, Brian
AU - Earl, Julia
AU - Gervasi, Stephanie S.
AU - Hoverman, Jason T.
AU - Hyman, Oliver
AU - Lemmon, Emily Moriarty
AU - Luhring, Thomas M.
AU - Michelson, Moses
AU - Murray, Chris
AU - Price, Steven
AU - Semlitsch, Raymond D.
AU - Sih, Andrew
AU - Stoler, Aaron B.
AU - VandenBroek, Nick
AU - Warwick, Alexa
AU - Wengert, Greta
AU - Hammond, John I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Environmental variation favors the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. For many species, we understand the costs and benefits of different phenotypes, but we lack a broad understanding of how plastic traits evolve across large clades. Using identical experiments conducted across North America, we examined prey responses to predator cues. We quantified five life-history traits and the magnitude of their plasticity for 23 amphibian species/populations (spanning three families and five genera) when exposed to no cues, crushed-egg cues, and predatory crayfish cues. Embryonic responses varied considerably among species and phylogenetic signal was common among the traits, whereas phylogenetic signal was rare for trait plasticities. Among trait-evolution models, the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model provided the best fit or was essentially tied with Brownian motion. Using the best fitting model, evolutionary rates for plasticities were higher than traits for three life-history traits and lower for two. These data suggest that the evolution of life-history traits in amphibian embryos is more constrained by a species’ position in the phylogeny than is the evolution of life history plasticities. The fact that an OU model of trait evolution was often a good fit to patterns of trait variation may indicate adaptive optima for traits and their plasticities.
AB - Environmental variation favors the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. For many species, we understand the costs and benefits of different phenotypes, but we lack a broad understanding of how plastic traits evolve across large clades. Using identical experiments conducted across North America, we examined prey responses to predator cues. We quantified five life-history traits and the magnitude of their plasticity for 23 amphibian species/populations (spanning three families and five genera) when exposed to no cues, crushed-egg cues, and predatory crayfish cues. Embryonic responses varied considerably among species and phylogenetic signal was common among the traits, whereas phylogenetic signal was rare for trait plasticities. Among trait-evolution models, the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model provided the best fit or was essentially tied with Brownian motion. Using the best fitting model, evolutionary rates for plasticities were higher than traits for three life-history traits and lower for two. These data suggest that the evolution of life-history traits in amphibian embryos is more constrained by a species’ position in the phylogeny than is the evolution of life history plasticities. The fact that an OU model of trait evolution was often a good fit to patterns of trait variation may indicate adaptive optima for traits and their plasticities.
KW - Anaxyrus
KW - Hyla
KW - Lithobates
KW - Pseudacris
KW - Rana
KW - phylogenetic inertia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042118987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042118987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/evo.13428
DO - 10.1111/evo.13428
M3 - Article
C2 - 29345312
AN - SCOPUS:85042118987
SN - 0014-3820
VL - 72
SP - 663
EP - 678
JO - Evolution
JF - Evolution
IS - 3
ER -