Positive and negative symptoms/syndromes in schizophrenia reliability and validity of different diagnostic systems

V. Peralta, M. J. Cuesta, J. De Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper explores the reliability, concurrent validity and overlap of some positive/negative symptom ratmg scales and typological criteria in 100 schizophrenic patients. Rating scales include Andreasen's Scales for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms, Abrams and Taylor's Scale for Emotional Blunting, and Kay's Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Criteria for categorizing individual patients include Andreasen's and Kay's criteria for positive and negative types of schizophrenia as well as Carpenter's criteria for the deficit syndrome. The correlations among positive as well as among negative scales were high. The agreement among criteria tended to be lower. Both positive scales showed low internal consistency. Kay's negative scale had the greatest internal consistency, which suggests that it is measuring a homogeneous syndrome. All negative symptom scales and categorical syndromes identified a group of patients who were single and exhibited schizoid or schizotypal pre-morbid personality disorders, poor premorbid sexual/social adjustment, poor response to neuroleptics and poor prognosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-50
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1995

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study has partly been funded by the Health Department of the Government of Navarra (Spain).

Funding

This study has partly been funded by the Health Department of the Government of Navarra (Spain).

FundersFunder number
Health Department of the Government of Navarra

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Positive and negative symptoms/syndromes in schizophrenia reliability and validity of different diagnostic systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this