Postoperative C5 Palsy after Anterior or Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Alex B. Bak, Ali Moghaddamjou, Mohammed Alvi, Henry Ahn, H. Francis Farhadi, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Ahmad Nassr, Praveen Mummaneni, Paul M. Arnold, W. Bradley Jacobs, K. Daniel Riew, Michael Kelly, Darrel S. Brodke, Alexander R. Vaccaro, Alan S. Hilibrand, Jason Wilson, James S. Harrop, S. Tim Yoon, Kee D. Kim, Daryl R. FourneyCarlo Santaguida, Eric M. Massicotte, Branko Kopjar, Michael G. Fehlings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study of prospectively accrued data. Objective. To evaluate a large, prospective, multicentre dataset of surgically treated degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) cases on the contemporary risk of C5 palsy with surgical approach. Summary of Background Data. The influence of surgical technique on postoperative C5 palsy after decompression for DCM is intensely debated. Comprehensive, covariate-adjusted analyses are needed using contemporary data. Methods. Patients with moderate to severe DCM were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter, randomized, Phase III CSM-Protect clinical trial and underwent either anterior or posterior decompression between Jan 31, 2012 and May 16, 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy, defined as the onset of muscle weakness by at least one grade in manual muscle test at the C5 myotome with slight or absent sensory disruption after cervical surgery. Two comparative cohorts were made based on the anterior or posterior surgical approach. Multivariate hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for C5 palsy. Results. A total of 283 patients were included, and 53.4% underwent posterior decompression. The total incidence of postoperative C5 palsy was 7.4% and was significantly higher in patients who underwent posterior decompression compared with anterior decompression (11.26% vs. 3.03%, P = 0.008). After multivariable regression, the posterior approach was independently associated with greater than four times the likelihood of postoperative C5 palsy (P = 0.017). Rates of C5 palsy recovery were comparable between the two surgical approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1410-1416
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume49
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Funding

None. The original CSM-Protect study was funded by AO Spine North America. M.G.F. would like to acknowledge support from the Robert Campeau Family Foundation / Dr C.H. Tator Chair in Brain and Spinal Cord Research at UHN.

FundersFunder number
AO Spine North America
Robert Campeau Family Foundation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Clinical Neurology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative C5 Palsy after Anterior or Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this