Posttraumatic growth and benefit-finding in lung cancer survivors: The benefit of rural residence?

Michael A. Andrykowski, Rachel F. Steffens, Heather M. Bush, Thomas C. Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rural cancer survivors report more distress than non-rural survivors. Little research has examined whether rural residence might also be linked to positive psychological outcomes. Rural (n = 117) and non-rural (n = 76) lung cancer survivors completed measures of posttraumatic growth, benefit-finding, and distress. Rural survivors reported more posttraumatic growth than urban survivors. There were no differences in benefit-finding. Mediation analyses indicated distress mediated the relationship between rural residence and posttraumatic growth. Findings suggest rural residence might be beneficial with regard to potential for posttraumatic growth among cancer survivors. Consistent with trauma theory, distress mediated the relationship between rural residence and posttraumatic growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-905
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.

Keywords

  • benefit-finding
  • oncology
  • positive psychology
  • posttraumatic growth
  • rural
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Posttraumatic growth and benefit-finding in lung cancer survivors: The benefit of rural residence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this