TY - GEN
T1 - Potential performance costs associated with large-format tiled displays for surgical visualization
AU - Seidelman, Will
AU - Carswell, C. Melody
AU - Lio, Cindy H.
AU - Grant, Russell C.
AU - Sublette, Michelle
AU - Field, Matt
AU - Seales, Brent
AU - Clarke, Duncan
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Twenty-five participants performed a surgical training task on a large format display created from one projector or by tiling the images from a 4-, or 9-projector array. Utilizing a large-format display consisting of tiled projector images brings the potential benefits of increased display size with the potential threats to performance of inherent visual artifacts. The effect of these artifacts on performance and subjective workload was assessed. Results indicate that while display size did not affect performance on the surgical task, differences in mental workload were observed. Although a global measure of workload indicated that the tiled displays were the least demanding to use, participants reported deploying additional but highly specific cognitive resources when using these same displays. Their resource shifts seemed to involve adjustments to the perceived control gains created by enhanced size and also degraded ability to compare target sizes in the larger display, possibly due to the obscuring effect of tile edges.
AB - Twenty-five participants performed a surgical training task on a large format display created from one projector or by tiling the images from a 4-, or 9-projector array. Utilizing a large-format display consisting of tiled projector images brings the potential benefits of increased display size with the potential threats to performance of inherent visual artifacts. The effect of these artifacts on performance and subjective workload was assessed. Results indicate that while display size did not affect performance on the surgical task, differences in mental workload were observed. Although a global measure of workload indicated that the tiled displays were the least demanding to use, participants reported deploying additional but highly specific cognitive resources when using these same displays. Their resource shifts seemed to involve adjustments to the perceived control gains created by enhanced size and also degraded ability to compare target sizes in the larger display, possibly due to the obscuring effect of tile edges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952934413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952934413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1518/107118110X12829370087968
DO - 10.1518/107118110X12829370087968
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:79952934413
SN - 9781617820885
T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
SP - 1430
EP - 1434
BT - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
T2 - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
Y2 - 27 September 2010 through 1 October 2010
ER -