Prediction of beef meat emulsion quality with apparent light backscatter extinction

D. Álvarez; M. Castillo; Y. L. Xiong; F. A. Payne

doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002

Prediction of beef meat emulsion quality with apparent light backscatter extinction

D. Álvarez, M. Castillo, Y. L. Xiong, F. A. Payne

Animal and Food Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Normalized light backscatter intensity (I_N) response as a function of fat/lean ratio (R_FL; 0.075, 0.25, and 0.33), chopping time (CT; 2, 5 and 8min) and fiber separation distances (d; 2, 2.5 and 3mm), were measured using a fiber optic spectrometer. Models based on the apparent light extinction coefficient (model I), fat/nonfat solid concentrations (model II), and the intensity ratio between optical distances (model III), were tested for IN0 prediction (I_N at d=0). Model I was significantly (P<0.0001) better than model II for prediction at 570nm (λ), 8min (CT), and 0.075 of R_FL. Model III showed maximum geometry values and extinction coefficients for optical fiber separations of 2 and 2.5mm, yielding the higher R² as R_FL and wavelength increased. The results demonstrated a high correlation between functional properties of meat emulsion (i.e., R_FL) and optical wavebands that may have potential for predicting IN0 using an optic sensor technology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1260-1266
Number of pages	7
Journal	Food Research International
Volume	43
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002
State	Published - Jun 2010

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank the Séneca Foundation (Consejería de Educación y Cultura. CC.AA. Murcia, Spain) and the Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation (University of Kentucky, USA) for the financial support provided by the research projects “Applying optical sensor technologies for determining meat emulsion stability” and “Development of an optical backscatter sensor technology for monitoring and controlling meat emulsification during the chopping process”.

Funding

The authors wish to thank the Séneca Foundation (Consejería de Educación y Cultura. CC.AA. Murcia, Spain) and the Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation (University of Kentucky, USA) for the financial support provided by the research projects “Applying optical sensor technologies for determining meat emulsion stability” and “Development of an optical backscatter sensor technology for monitoring and controlling meat emulsification during the chopping process”.

Funders	Funder number
University of Kentucky
Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation

Keywords

Fiber optic
Light extinction
Meat emulsion
Prediction models
Sensor technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Food Science

Access to Document

10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002

Cite this

@article{d817eef1aefd43399a25f719f4fa6126,

title = "Prediction of beef meat emulsion quality with apparent light backscatter extinction",

abstract = "Normalized light backscatter intensity (IN) response as a function of fat/lean ratio (RFL; 0.075, 0.25, and 0.33), chopping time (CT; 2, 5 and 8min) and fiber separation distances (d; 2, 2.5 and 3mm), were measured using a fiber optic spectrometer. Models based on the apparent light extinction coefficient (model I), fat/nonfat solid concentrations (model II), and the intensity ratio between optical distances (model III), were tested for IN0 prediction (IN at d=0). Model I was significantly (P<0.0001) better than model II for prediction at 570nm (λ), 8min (CT), and 0.075 of RFL. Model III showed maximum geometry values and extinction coefficients for optical fiber separations of 2 and 2.5mm, yielding the higher R2 as RFL and wavelength increased. The results demonstrated a high correlation between functional properties of meat emulsion (i.e., RFL) and optical wavebands that may have potential for predicting IN0 using an optic sensor technology.",

keywords = "Fiber optic, Light extinction, Meat emulsion, Prediction models, Sensor technology",

author = "D. {\'A}lvarez and M. Castillo and Xiong, {Y. L.} and Payne, {F. A.}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors wish to thank the S{\'e}neca Foundation (Consejer{\'i}a de Educaci{\'o}n y Cultura. CC.AA. Murcia, Spain) and the Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation (University of Kentucky, USA) for the financial support provided by the research projects “Applying optical sensor technologies for determining meat emulsion stability” and “Development of an optical backscatter sensor technology for monitoring and controlling meat emulsification during the chopping process”.",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "1260--1266",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of beef meat emulsion quality with apparent light backscatter extinction

AU - Álvarez, D.

AU - Castillo, M.

AU - Xiong, Y. L.

AU - Payne, F. A.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors wish to thank the Séneca Foundation (Consejería de Educación y Cultura. CC.AA. Murcia, Spain) and the Kentucky Science and Engineering Foundation (University of Kentucky, USA) for the financial support provided by the research projects “Applying optical sensor technologies for determining meat emulsion stability” and “Development of an optical backscatter sensor technology for monitoring and controlling meat emulsification during the chopping process”.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Normalized light backscatter intensity (IN) response as a function of fat/lean ratio (RFL; 0.075, 0.25, and 0.33), chopping time (CT; 2, 5 and 8min) and fiber separation distances (d; 2, 2.5 and 3mm), were measured using a fiber optic spectrometer. Models based on the apparent light extinction coefficient (model I), fat/nonfat solid concentrations (model II), and the intensity ratio between optical distances (model III), were tested for IN0 prediction (IN at d=0). Model I was significantly (P<0.0001) better than model II for prediction at 570nm (λ), 8min (CT), and 0.075 of RFL. Model III showed maximum geometry values and extinction coefficients for optical fiber separations of 2 and 2.5mm, yielding the higher R2 as RFL and wavelength increased. The results demonstrated a high correlation between functional properties of meat emulsion (i.e., RFL) and optical wavebands that may have potential for predicting IN0 using an optic sensor technology.

AB - Normalized light backscatter intensity (IN) response as a function of fat/lean ratio (RFL; 0.075, 0.25, and 0.33), chopping time (CT; 2, 5 and 8min) and fiber separation distances (d; 2, 2.5 and 3mm), were measured using a fiber optic spectrometer. Models based on the apparent light extinction coefficient (model I), fat/nonfat solid concentrations (model II), and the intensity ratio between optical distances (model III), were tested for IN0 prediction (IN at d=0). Model I was significantly (P<0.0001) better than model II for prediction at 570nm (λ), 8min (CT), and 0.075 of RFL. Model III showed maximum geometry values and extinction coefficients for optical fiber separations of 2 and 2.5mm, yielding the higher R2 as RFL and wavelength increased. The results demonstrated a high correlation between functional properties of meat emulsion (i.e., RFL) and optical wavebands that may have potential for predicting IN0 using an optic sensor technology.

KW - Fiber optic

KW - Light extinction

KW - Meat emulsion

KW - Prediction models

KW - Sensor technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953913213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953913213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953913213

SN - 0963-9969

VL - 43

SP - 1260

EP - 1266

JO - Food Research International

JF - Food Research International

IS - 5

ER -

Prediction of beef meat emulsion quality with apparent light backscatter extinction

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this